OBAMA’S THIRD TERM: Part III – The Deep Dark Roots of Cloward-Piven and Obama Go Deeper Than You May Think

Political Moonshine
by Political Moonshine

 

obama-3rd-term-iii

Emerging as a presidential candidate seemingly manifested out of nowhere and from thin air, in 2009, Barack Obama entered office on the promise to “fundamentally” transform the United States of America. Giving credit where credit is due, Obama’s oratory prowess is and continues to be a weapon of mass destruction in its own right for the pen is mightier than the sword and no one reads a teleprompter in more devastating fashion than Obama.

For over a decade, the duplicitous imposter Obama has hoodwinked good Americans into false premises and he continues to do so with his keen ability to wordsmith planned devastation into flowery patriotic messaging that appears as one thing while functioning as something entirely and deceptively different. The results have been catastrophic for this once proud constitutional republic and we’re presently living through them as Obama continues his administration in the second year of his third term.

Did anyone ever pause to think about the literal translation and application of his “fundamentally transforming the United States of America” statement relative to the geopolitical landscape, what exactly he meant by that statement and how such a transformation might impact America as seen today? I recall watching it in real time and thinking to myself, “Why would anyone want to “fundamentally transform” America? Transform it into what?”

The United States was the last bastion of liberty and freedom and what good of any kind is derived from moving away from that? The use of past tense there is deliberate. Of course, Obama’s planned transformation was repeatedly sown into the rhetorical political fabric as George W. Bush’s fault and that was fodder enough to bamboozle good people while also motivating a large swath of functional idiots incapable of independent and critical thinking to applaud it and support his administration. It continues today.

If there are lingering doubts about whether there is a grain of truth to the assertions being made and evidenced here, consume this 13-second video as anecdotal evidence while asking yourself, “When was the last time you saw a “U.S. president” in Biden so impotent and inconsequential?” Moreover, ask yourself, “When was the last time you saw a former U.S. president in Obama refuse to adhere to tradition by secluding into private life, refuse to leave Washington, move just down the street from the White House and routinely interject himself into his successor’s administration and his former vice president’s subsequent administration?” The short answer to both is “never” and that anomalous pattern breaker is disconcerting at the deepest levels.

The 22nd Amendment of the United States Constitution places strict limits on the number of terms an individual can serve in the capacity of president but that hasn’t stopped Obama and the formidable and dark forces behind him. What it did; however, was necessitate a planned circumvention around it.

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of President more than once.

twenty-second amendment, u.s. constitution

The dark forces behind Obama specialize in a particular style and brand of extra-constitutional governance that leverages orchestrated crises to foment fear and chaos as mechanisms to implement policy by fraudulent means. It is often predicated by emergency authorization derived from the very fear and chaos they create. 9/11 and COVID-19 are precise and exact examples of this. It’s right out of Saul Alinsky’s ‘Rules for Radicals’ and its part and parcel with Cloward-Piven strategy; our focus here today in Part III of our series on Obama’s third term that draws back to June 2021 [Part I, Part II].

Alinsky’s 13 rules for radicals:

  1. “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.
  2. “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.
  3. “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.
  4. “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
  5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
  6. “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.
  7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news.
  8. “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.
  9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.
  10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.” It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.
  11. “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.
  12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.
  13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.

A major premise imperative for comprehension relative to the status quo is four-fold: 1-Obama’s third term represents the end product of overthrowing the United States, 2-The overthrow of the United States must occur by internally controlled demolition predicated by broad but precise and decades-long infiltration of the nation’s institutions, agencies and departments that comprise the federal apparatus writ large; 3-The process bends federalism back against Americans; and 4-The process does not entail compromising all 50 states as some might think but rather 37 major urban hub areas constituting a suitable threshold to adequately impact policy determinations and election results.

The blueprint for overthrow was the U.S. Department of Defense counterinsurgency manual that Obama inherited upon his 2009 inauguration, which delineates U.S. military and intelligence community strategy to enact regime change in foreign nations [explained in that series consisting of Part I and Part II]. This progression of older COVID-19 graphics below illustrates these concepts:

—————————————————————

—————————————————————

—————————————————————

There are no coincidences and the direct geographical overlays across seemingly unrelated and dissociated contexts is fully by design. Given what has been outlined and copiously and arduously evidenced in a catalog of work that is now several hundred articles deep, we are compelled to ask, “How did we get here?”

The answer is found in coming to understand Obama relative to the deep, dark roots of Cloward-Piven strategy that he promised when he made his guarantee of “fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

We begin our understanding with this series of recent illustrations respective to the Cloward-Piven – a topic covered for some time now – and Obama the deceiver:

—————————————————————

—————————————————————

—————————————————————

If there are three things we do well at Moonshine they are our specialty of fraud; making accurate projections and analysis; and encompassing a broad scope of seemingly unrelated, dissociated and independent matters to fit them precisely together for accurate comprehension of the broader landscape. This is mentioned because these graphics entail a lot: illegal immigration, inflation, consumer and wholesale pricing, economics, the Western Empire’s manufactured war with Russia in Ukraine and more. Every granular bit of it is related and by design.

Back to our question, “How did we get here?”

Enter Cloward-Piven, the Clinton and Bush presidencies, Obama, Columbia University, ACORN and the sub-prime mortgage lending crisis of 2008. The particulars arrive in an 04 Nov 12 publication at America’s Return to Independence that was forwarded to us by Mostly Peaceful Farva, who is a member at Marco Polo, the team begun by former Trump White House official Garrett Ziegler. It is entitled How ACORN, Obama, and Bill Clinton started the sub prime crisis.

When Obama arrived on scene circa 2008 and 2009; and promising to fundamentally transform the nation, he wasn’t shooting from the hip. Far from it. Rather, Obama arrived as selected and groomed for the designed task with a carefully acquired pedigree and fully prepared with a verifiable but denied history that made him all of these things.

The following extractions, quotes and facts are all derived from our source document [*Some quoted sentences have been truncated and some minor changes in punctuation have been made to improve the flow of reading. Minor corrections in punctuation have also been made. Emphasis by the original author has been left in place. All content from the source document is contained within quotation marks (” “) and all other content is Moonshine.]

Noting that Cloward and Piven were both professors at Columbia University, we have our first direct overlay given that Columbia is Obama’s alma mater, “ACORN was started in the 1970’s by Radicals George Wiley & Wade Rathke, with input from sociologists Richard A. Cloward and Frances Fox Piven.  All of them are neo-Marxist ideologists.”

“ACORN is made up of several legally distinct parts including local non-profits, a national lobbying organization, and the ACORN Housing Corporation. ACORN is partisan and always aligned with the Democratic Party on policy,” and this is emblematic of how the system bends back against Americans by using proxies such as nongovernmental organizations [NGOs], nonprofits, lobbyists, etc.

Obama’s backdrop with ACORN began in 1992 with Project Vote where he served, “as a trainer for the “power” seminars.” Let’s distill this fact for meaning that will become more fulsome as we go: From the beginning Obama’s history pertains to impacting voting and voting systems across America. Therein, it’s important to recall that voting is a component of federalism and therefore a function of each individual state; not the federal government. This is evident today in the fruitless challenges still ongoing post-2020 in places like Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Arizona.

The ‘People’s Platform Preamble’ for ACORN reads like it comes straight from Xi’s China or Lenin’s Russia. It includes,

We are an uncommon people. We are the majority, forged from all minorities.  We are the masses of many, not the forces of few.  We will continue our fight until the American way is just one way, until we have shared the wealth, until we have won our freedom…This is not a simple vision, but a detailed plan…Our plan is to build an American reality from the American rhetoric, to deliver a piece of the present and the fruits of the future to every man, to every woman, to every family…We demand our birthright: the chance to be rich, the right to be free… “

ACORN: People’s Platform Preamble

Notably, “Their goal is expressed when they state, “We will continue our fight until the American way is just one way, until we have shared the wealth, until we have won our freedom.” In fork-tongued doublespeak, the party of so-called diversity is committed to only one way. Those things are mutually exclusive and emblematic of Obama, the U.S. Democratic Party and these Socialist and Marxist Communists writ large.

Despite Obama’s repeated denials of his affiliation and history with ACORN and despite efforts to scrub the documentation, Obama is on record with a plain admission,

“I’ve been fighting alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career.  Even before I was an elected official, when I ran Project Vote voter registration drive in Illinois, ACORN was smack dab in the middle of it, and we appreciate your work.”

Barack Obama, Speech to ACORN, November 2007

After publicly endorsing ACORN, Obama, “then paid them more than $800,000 for its voter registration efforts. ACORN used a lot of this money for voter registration fraud.  Obama’s campaign disguised these payments in its’ FEC disclosure as payments to a front group called Citizen Services Inc. for “advance work.”  After initially telling the Federal Election Commission this money was for “staging, sound, lighting,” Obama’s campaign later admitted the cash was to get out the vote.

Given the above fact set as augmented by our understanding of HAMR and Scorecard, which represents the intelligence community’s technical capability to intercede on and determine electoral outcomes in foreign nations that was leveraged back against Americans as a failed attempt in 2016 and a successful one in 2020, we are compelled to contemplate whether Obama’s first electoral victory was legitimate or not. On the assumption it was illegitimate, his second victory most certainly was, too. Proxy Joe Biden’s 2020 installation was almost certainly not the first of its kind in America.

Further evidence of Obama’s illicit history of American voter interference can be found in his service as, “ACORN’s attorney in the “Motor Voter” case instrumental in organizing “Project VOTE” in 1992.  The sole purpose of these activities was to destroy the integrity of the voting system.”

Destroy the integrity of the voting system he did. Look around you.

In 2004 and appearing in the journal Social Policy, Chicago ACORN leader Toni Foulkes wrote an item entitled The Barack Obama Campaign. In it, Foulkes exclaimed, “Obama took the case, known as ACORN vs. Edgar (the name of the Republican governor at the time) and we won.  Obama then went on to run a voter registration project with Project VOTE in 1992.  Since then, we have invited Obama to our leadership training sessions to run the session on power every year, and, as a result, many of our newly developing leaders got to know him before he ever ran for office.  Thus it was natural for many of us to be active volunteers in his first campaign for State Senate and then his failed bid for U.S. Congress in 1996. By the time he ran for U.S. Senate, we were old friends.”

From that fact set, we glean that there was an indoctrination warm-up period by which the dark forces behind Obama began to the install him in the national political scene and it coincided with what Obama would later describe as a civilian army existing outside of the U.S. military for purposes of national defense. This is word salad for a fundamental transformation devised for overthrow respective to federalism.

We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.

Barack Obama

Now apply that quote to this fact set relative to ACORN and whereby, “ACORN, claiming a membership of 400,000, is funded in part by wealthy, anti-American radicals such as George Soros and our tax dollars. George Soros and Barrack Obama have ties and share similar interests, namely in destroying our free markets.”

Now look back-up at the graphics above and in consideration of the concept of prosecutorial discretion and Soros’ funding of prosecutors across the nation. One can’t pursue justice for crimes – like stolen elections – with out prosecutors willing to leverage their discretion to do so.

Now apply the destruction of our free markets respective to Cloward-Piven strategy and the evidence of it as depicted in the illustrations also above.

Further encroaching on America’s free and fair elections and, “acting as ACORN’s lawyer, Obama sued Illinois in 1993, to make voter registration laxer. The intent of relaxing voter registration rules was to allow illegal votes to occur.”

Resting on a mountain of Moonshine work exclusively evidencing COVID-19 as a multipurpose enterprise fraud construct, its primary function was to circumvent regular voting processes to create portals permitting the massive and rampant voter fraud that delivered Proxy Joe Biden and Obama’s third term in 2020.

Moreover, voter fraud portals appear, “to be the Democratic purpose in its objection to the Voter ID amendments. Why wouldn’t you want voter ID laws unless you were going to benefit from it? The Democrats favor illegal votes that would put themselves into office rather than protect the rights of true Americans.”

As I continue to say, look around you.

Cloward-Piven entails the destruction of U.S. systems – economic and otherwise – and is geared toward designed nefarious ends. Therein, individuals like Obama and Biden and events like 9/11 and COVID-19 rarely if ever exist for any singular purpose but rather for multitudes of them. In this sense and further expanding our broader understanding here, Obama’s targeting of banking, lending and mortgages becomes entirely evident.

Accordingly, Obama’s actions speak loudly and for themselves. Moreover, they become even more readily apparent when coming to understand that Obama picked America’s biggest scab to make it happen: its history with slavery and fraudulent allegations of nonexistent ‘systemic racism.’ It’s an old and tattered card and it gets played incessantly; especially when the fact set stands antithetical to the propagated narrative.

Consider that, “Obama sued Citibank (Buycks-Roberson) as ACORN’s attorney in 1994 to force them into giving sub prime loans to homebuyers with poor credit ratings, setting the stage for the mortgage meltdown.”

View that as a designed plan and not a direct consequence for there is a distinct difference between them. Continuing and, “as one commentator noted in May 2008, legal “successes” such as this were probably responsible for the sub-prime mortgage crisis of 2007 AND 2008.  That is, banks were not loaning to blacks whose credit was poor.  When the law forced them to lend money anyway, the inevitable collapse occurred.  [Yes, the very reasons for the mortgage meltdown was what Obama and ACORN fought for and then when it melted down, blamed President Bush and Wall Street.]  After obtaining a settlement in the Citibank litigation, ACORN used its subsidiary organization ACORN Housing, a nationwide organization with offices in more than 30 U.S. cities, to push the group’s radical agenda to get sub prime home buyers mortgages under the most favorable terms possible.”

Recalling our introduction to Rules for Radicals above, it’s obviously apparent that ACORN’s tactical plan derives from it. According to Alinsky, “these rules claim the ends justify the means, be it by ridicule, lies, cheating, etc.”

Look around you. Look at the fraud delivered by COVID-19 and the stolen 2020 election it subsequently delivered. Cheating falls well short of an adequate description here. These people are all-in with the heaviest of consequences on the line.

Now factor in the mainstream media and its illicit behavior over the last several years; noting the direct overlay with BIG PHARMA and hence, the enterprise fraud construct of COVID-19.

—————————————————————

—————————————————————

—————————————————————

—————————————————————

Understanding that the MSM is owned by six multinational corporations that are owned by BlackRock and Vanguard – all covered in existing Moonshine work – think back to the MSM’s treatment of President Donald Trump respective to fabricated Russia narratives and everything else salacious about him. Position it all relative to how, “the rules include holding the virtuous to exaggerated and impossible standards, while not playing by their rules.” This is especially so knowing that the entire Russian narrative was constructed.

Then further reflect back on Obama’s promise of a fundamental transformation respective to, “one of the chief objectives [being] to sell “change.” The result of that change is an enforced “egalitarian” (Marxist) society. Obama has taught these “rules.” Who can argue that Obama has not employed these means extensively since 2008 by lying, selling change, and holding the virtuous to exaggerated, impossible standards?”

Furthermore, who can argue that these means haven’t continued and been severely exacerbated and intensified in Obama’s third term with demented and delusional Proxy Joe Biden running the point?

This is how BlackRock and Vanguard fit into the broader scope of treason according to old Moonshine.

Tactically and aligned with Obama/Biden policy, “Cloward, Piven, and ACORN’s leaders pushed to greatly expand America’s welfare roles.” View this as a direct implementation of Cloward-Piven. It also gives further explanation as to why Obama and the U.S. politiburo demanded Obamacare and why Obama expanded coverage for Medicaid.

“ACORN was a driving force for the revised Community Reinvestment Act of 1995, pushing sub prime mortgages through a eager Fannie Mae.  This allowed ACORN to pressure mortgagors to grant bad loans to bad risk homebuyers in the name of helping the poor.  Many of the poor were hurt further, while Fannie Mae prospered.  Their personnel gave Obama‘s campaign $126,349.”

Recalling a major premise in Moonshine work, George H.W. Bush is the head of the snake and except for Trump, the candidates on both sides of every presidential election since him were his; as resting on the political continuum he installed and which has been arduously evidenced in our work.

Central to that continuum is The Clinton Crime Family. So, in respect to Cloward-Piven, consider that, “in a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation eased the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders, … under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration.  The roots of the financial crisis go back to 1993, when Fannie and Freddie began stocking up on sub prime and other risky loans while reporting them as prime.”

“Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the 1990s by reducing down payment requirements. “Yet there remain too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called sub prime market.”

Franklin Raines, then Fannie Mae Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Fraud entails changing inconvenient rules, regulations and laws as indicated in the above quote and respective to it, “the meltdown in sub prime home mortgages has been widely regarded as a major contributing cause of the current [at that time] recession that officially began in December 2008 after two consecutive quarters of negative growth in gross domestic product, or GDP.”

Reflecting back on Obama’s quote about a civilian army, its necessary funding and the purpose of NGOs as the interface between private and public corruption, the “Obama administration’s $787 economic stimulus package allowed ACORN access to approximately $2 billion for non-profit “neighborhood stabilization” non-governmental organizations.” 

Once the full impact of Obama’s policies and his pre-exisiting bedrock of litigation were realized with such disastrous effects for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the nation as a whole, intervention was required on the administration’s behalf. Consider that, “the Treasury Department, under the advice the administration, removed the $400 billion cap to keep Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac solvent.  These two government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) are responsible for one of the worst policy disasters in history.  The GSEs had begun buying risky loans in 1993 (under Clinton) to meet the “affordable housing” requirements established under congressional direction by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).”

Reasonably, we could brand that ‘all in the family’; as in the GHWB family.

Consequently, “most of the damage was done from 2005 through 2007, when Fannie and Freddie were binging on risky mortgages,” and, “by the end of 2008, Fannie and Freddie held or guaranteed approximately 10 million sub prime and Alt-A mortgages and mortgage-backed securities (MBS);” with “a total principal balance of $1.6 trillion.”

Moreover, “there were 26 million-sub prime and Alt-A loans outstanding in 2008: 10 million by Fannie and Freddie, 5.2 million by other government agencies, and 1.4 million were on the books of the four largest U.S. banks.  In addition, about 7.7 million sub prime and Alt-A housing loans were in mortgage pools supporting MBS issued by Wall Street banks.”

Unmistakably by design and respective to Cloward-Piven, “Fannie and Freddie’s problems mounted in large part to HUD’s affordable housing regulations that required that in 2007 that 55% of all the loans the agencies acquired had to be made to borrowers at or below the median income, with almost half of these required to be low-income borrowers.”

Now, note this enormously important timeline component relative to the concept of set-up and take-down. The set-up came to full fruition in 2008 with the consequences to be felt long thereafter. Who was then installed to oversee the take-down? The same guy who set it up by means of litigation and his activity at ACORN – Barack Obama. Who is still overseeing the take-down – the real take-down more appropriately labeled as an overthrow? Barack Obama vis-a-vis his proxy and point man, Joe Biden.

In further evidence of this, “an article by Professor David Walls directly connects Rathke’s ACORN to Alinsky, ACORN’s mission of pressuring banks to issue risky mortgages, and the alliance between ACORN and unions:  ACORN announced: “On Feb. 19, ACORN members will launch a new tactic in fighting foreclosures: civil disobedience.  Participants in the ACORN Home Savers campaign nationwide will simply refuse to move out of foreclosed homes, or in some cases, will move back in.  ACORN homesteaders intend to squat in their homes until a comprehensive, federal solution for people facing foreclosure is put in place.”

Civil disobedience? Nothing smacks of revolution, overthrow and Obama like civil disobedience. See summer 2020 and consider that, “Obama clearly follows these beliefs and almost daily encourages civil disobedience (Occupy Wall Street), class warfare (the 1%), social warfare (redistribution), partisan politics (never works with Republicans), the blame game (it’s everyone else’s fault, especially Bush’s), and race warfare.”

Reverting back to the MSM details above in respect to Cloward-Piven, ACORN and Obama, consider that, “a lawyer involved with legal action against Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) told a House Judiciary subcommittee on March 19, 2008, The New York Times had killed a story in October that would have shown a close link between ACORN, Project Vote and the Obama campaign because it would have been a “a game changer.”

The attorney told the congressional panel, “Upon learning this information and receiving the list of donors from the Obama campaign, Ms. Strom reported to Ms. Moncrief that her editors at The New York Times wanted her to kill the story because, and I quote, “it was a game changer.”

In further consideration of Obama’s civilian army and how it was likely shaped to determine the catastrophic geopolitical status quo, contemplate a statement by Matthew Vadum, a senior editor and analyst with CRC, as he, “determined that the Association of Community Organizers for Reform Now (ACORN) is best described as a “multi-headed hydra” with over 400,000 member families positioned in 110 cities fiercely opposed to the capitalist system.”

Noting Obama’s desire for adequate funding for this civilian army, “according to a Washington Examiner article, ACORN has taken in $53.6 million in federal funding since 1994. The taxpayers have been taken for $53.6 million that ended up in voting fraud scandals and a sub prime mortgage crisis, that ultimately cost this country its worst economy since the Great Depression.  This crisis was backed and supported by ACORN and its equivalent organizations, and was almost exclusively a democratic backed ideology.  All money into ACORNS programs, found its way back in terms of campaign support and money for Democrats.”

It seems that Proxy Joe Biden’s stewardship of Barack Obama’s third term is set to supplant Obama’s previous cataclysmic economic achievement. Cloward and Piven would be proud. So would Alinsky. So would Lenin. So is Xi Jinping.

It should not come as any surprise that the U.S. politiburo, which is certainly and directly culpable for the overthrow and subjugation to global governance that we face under Obama’s third term, covered Obama’s tracks for him at the time of his ascendance. Consider that then, “House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. backed off plans to investigate purported wrongdoing by the liberal activist group ACORN, saying “powers that be” put the kibosh on the idea.

The then largely Democratic House Appropriations Committee voted against the block of funding for ACORN after voting fraud allegations, but Bill Clinton’s appointee, U.S. District Court Judge Nina Gershon, “provided the corrupt ACORN a free pass out of trouble by issuing a federal injunction against the Congressional funding ban. In it, she claimed, “that it ran afoul of the Constitution because under the ban, ACORN was “singled out by Congress for punishment that directly and immediately affects their ability to continue to obtain federal funding, in the absence of any judicial, or even administrative, process adjudicating guilt.” 

Translated, this non sequitur legal interpretation means that, “essentially, Gershon’s ruling said ACORN can’t be punished now [then] because the Obama administration failed to punish it earlier via a long-overdue, much-needed criminal investigation into the group.”

How many times in U.S. history have we seen individuals and entities charged with investigating themselves and whereby the investigations are not surprisingly fruitless? Rinse/repeat all of the way to the insane asylum. More appropriately, rinse/repeat all of the way to the global plantation.

The evidenced and interrelated relationships are entirely problematic for the posterity of a once proud constitutional republic that is on its way to subjugation to global governance and the CCP’s brand of Marxist communism. They’re also both problematic and terrifying for the American people. That list includes but certainly is not limited to Obama, Biden, Clinton, GW Bush, GHW Bush, Soros, Alinsky, the MSM, the Federal Reserve, the Democratic Party, the U.S. politiburo, BlackRock, Vanguard, Cloward-Piven, ACORN, the sub-prime mortgage crisis, HAMR/Scorecard, COVID-19, Russia and Ukraine. I could go on.

In the end, the logically deduced, evidenced and problematic relationships provide a fulsome account explaining how Proxy Joe Biden is running the point for Barack Obama’s third term.

All hail King Obama.

-End-

 

Political Moonshine