The Coming Biological Infowar: US Proposes DNA Database

LocalOrg
by Tony Cartalucci


The US is proposing a government-backed DNA database composed of over a million volunteers’ genetic material. RT would report in their article, “Got genes: Obama proposes genetic biobank of 1mn Americans’ DNA to fight disease,” that:

A new $215 million US government proposal would seek more than 1 million American volunteers for analysis of their genetic information in an initiative to fight disease, while developing targeted health care based on one’s DNA.

Officials hope the biobank project, announced Friday by President Barack Obama, can merge existing genetic studies with a diverse range of new volunteers to hit 1 million participants.

While this initial database is composed of volunteers, involuntary blood samples are already collected by US law enforcement agencies around the country and amassed in an existing, and ever-expanding network. Additionally, the new proposal seeks to establish “precision medicine” as a standard in medical care, implying that everyone’s DNA will eventually be required by medical practitioners to administer increasingly state-run healthcare.

Such information will undoubtedly end up in an expanded, nationwide iteration of this new proposed network. 


Serial Abusers and Their New Toy 

While precision medicine is indeed a powerful tool in fighting disease and repairing injury – in fact, truly the future of medicine – those appointing themselves as its arbiter in the US have already demonstrated they cannot be trusted with such a responsibility.

RT would also note in their report that:

How the US government will ensure that individual genetic information is kept private will certainly become a point of concern for many. A government-led database system amassing genetic coding will likely face resistance in this age of a global spying regime run by the US National Security Agency (NSA) and a genetic patent system used by the likes of Monsanto to consolidate legal ownership of the natural world.

Indeed, a DNA database would be to our bodies, what the Internet was to our computers – with an NSA-like entity invading, abusing, exploiting, and manipulating not just our personal data, but the very genetic code that makes us who we are. The dangers are immense, and the abuse of genetic information has already been eagerly explored by the very special interests driving this new initiative.

The prospect of using one’s genes against them in the form of genospecific weapons was mentioned in the Neo-Conservative Project for a New American Century’s (PNAC) 2000 report titled, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” (.pdf) which stated:

The proliferation of ballistic and cruise missiles and long-range unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) will make it much easier to project military power around the globe.  Munitions themselves will become increasingly accurate, while new methods of attack – electronic, “non-lethal,” biological – will be more widely available. (p.71 of .pdf)

Although it may take several decade for the process of transformation to unfold, in time, the art of warfare on air, land, and sea will be vastly different than it is today, and  “combat” likely will take place in new dimensions: in space, “cyber-space,” and perhaps the world of microbes.  (p.72 of .pdf)

And advanced forms of biological warfare that can “target” specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool. (p.72 of .pdf)

This targeting will require a database of genetic information – which when coupled with the NSA’s already omnipresent surveillance – will enable the growing police state to locate and target individuals with genospecific weapons with unimaginable precision – a literal “touch of death” on equal to mythological gods able to strike down their enemies at will. 

How to Have the Best of Both Worlds 

The race to establish a top-down healthcare system based on genetically-driven precision medicine is done with the knowledge that the democratization of technology, including that involved in biology and genetics, is accelerating toward local labs being able to reproduce or even out-compete developments made by large pharmaceutical giants. This follows the same pattern IT followed, where disruptive technology, institutions, and paradigms allowed for rapid decentralization and downsizing.

Image: Precision medicine can precisely help us. It can also precisely hurt.

Small groups of people or even individuals now have a platform online with which to compete against multi-million dollar media studios. Likewise, 3D printing is driving a similar revolution in manufacturing.

“Do-it-Yourself biology” (DIYbio) is now positioned to disrupt the fields of biotech, human health, and medicine.

With DIYbio, individuals and communities can manage their own genetic information, sharing it how and when they decide, and work directly on applications to alter, improve, or repair it. The decentralization of this powerful technology also will establish a balance of power. Those with malevolent intentions will be kept in check by the fact that so many more people have a vested interest in preventing the abuse of this technology.

Like in the world of IT today, backups, firewalls, and a general knowledge of “good practices” will help protect the vast majority from the abuse of emerging genetically-driven precision medicine.

Already, there is a wealth of information online regarding DIYbio – which like its counterpart in IT – maintains an open source, collaborative ethos. People, understanding that preventing the use of this technology is impossible, can begin empowering themselves with it to ensure a balance of power is struck to prevent its wide scale abuse.

Coincidentally, the proposed decentralization of the Internet by local mesh networks would also serve to build defenses for genetic information stored by individuals on such networks. Establishing and promoting the idea of moving away from all forms of highly centralized systems maintained by serial offenders of our privacy and human rights, by democratizing the very technology they seek to monopolize and use against us, is the first step in winning this new battle before it starts.

LocalOrg

Judge: Power Company Can Refuse Electricity to Family that Removed Smart Meter

InfoWars
by MIKAEL THALEN

Power company forces Detroit family to rely on generator

A Detroit family that removed their home’s “Smart Meter” has been forced to rely on a generator after a local power company shut off their electricity.

The incident began last June when Andrea McNich and her husband asked to have their Smart Meter removed after Andrea began experiencing health issues.

“I started to not feel well again,” Andrea told WXYZ News. “I suffer from migraines and they started to come back and I couldn’t figure out what it was. And then other people in the community, and I have clients all over the globe, and other people started having these weird symptoms.”

In an attempt to remedy her painful headaches, Andrea says she asked her power company, DTE Energy, to replace her meter with an earlier analog version.

DTE refused Andrea’s request and instead claimed that they would allow her to “opt-out” by disabling her Smart Meter’s ability to emit powerful radio signals.

“We have a choice, that is our opt-out program,” said Bob Sitkauskas, General Manager, Advanced Metering Infrastructure at DTE. “That is the AMI meter with the radio shut off. So that meter is not transmitting whatsoever. We have to go there and physically read that meter.”

According to Andrea, the option provides little reassurance given power companies’ constant lies regarding Smart Meters.

“It’s a false opt-out program, in that I’m not allowed the choice to have an analog meter,” she said.

Taking matters into her own hands, Andrea removed the Smart Meter and replaced it with an analog model last October, a move reportedly against state law.

Aside from legal issues, DTE claimed the unapproved instillation posed a safety risk, despite countless Smart Meters bursting into flames across the country.

Although the Michigan Public Service Commission was set to rule on the matter last December, DTE chose to disable Andrea’s power before the commission made its decision.

After being told that she did not have the right to choose what was installed on her home, Andrea and her husband took the matter to court.

A judge in the Oakland County Circuit Court ruled similarly, arguing that DTE had no obligation to restore power to Andrea’s home, thus forcing her to continue using a generator.

The McNich family is only one of many currently raising concerns over the safety of Smart Meters.

According to physician and epidemiologist Sam Milham, Smart Meters, which are linked to an array of health issues, emit as much as 100 times the amount of radiation as a cell phone.

Daniel Hirsch, a senior lecturer on nuclear policy at UCSC, says the federal government purposely misleads the public by conducting biased safety studies at the behest of power companies.

A Washington DC power company stirred controversy in 2013 after they were caught lying to the public about how often their smart meters emitted radiation. Despite claims that the meters only emitted radiation once every 4 to 6 hours, an investigation by WUSA9 News revealed the frequency to be closer to 4 to 6 times every minute.

Health issues aside, the main purpose of Smart Meters lie in their ability to harvest vast amounts of personal information.

An electrical engineer in Washington state filed suit in 2013 after his power company demanded he pay a fee in order to opt-out of the Smart Meter program.

“The issue that we have with the smart meter technology is that it really is an invasion of privacy to the homeowner,” the engineer said. “I don’t want to be told when I can run my dishwasher and when I can run my refrigerator.”

German researchers analyzing several Smart Meters in 2012 discovered that the meters transmitted incredibly specific data,down to what movie was being watched on TV.

In reality, Smart Meters are only one part of the larger “Smart Grid,” a system which will enable federal authorities to control everything from your dishwasher to thermostat.

As former CIA Director CIA Director David Petraeus stated in 2012, homes connected into the smart grid will be easily surveilled by intelligence agencies.

“Items of interest will be located, identified, monitored, and remotely controlled through technologies such as radio-frequency identification, sensor networks, tiny embedded servers, and energy harvesters — all connected to the next-generation internet using abundant, low-cost, and high-power computing,” Petraeus said.

InfoWars

An Indisputable Database for Chemtrail Deniers

Activist Post
by Catherine J. Frompovich

The Washington Post article of January 22, 2015 titled “How a group of conspiracy theorists could derail the debate over climate policy” prompted this response to what either the Post’s editors or article author apparently overlooked or did not choose to do, in my journalistic opinion—publish facts!

Over the years, The Washington Post acquired numerous awards for excellent investigative journalism, etc., including the prestigious Pulitzer Prize several times, the last being in 2014. One would imagine—at least this writer’s journalistic opinion—that extensive and accurate research would be the ground floor for factual, open-source, non-pejorative, non-ad hominem reporting and journalism.

When journalist Puneet Kollipara postulates, “Meet the “chemtrails” crowd, who posit that governments, scientists and other institutions are using airplanes’ “chemtrails” — basically contrails that are allegedly laced with chemicals — to alter the climate, create extreme weather, poison people, or even control our minds,” and “In short, chemtrails itself is a conspiracy theory,” someone needs to point out that The Washington Post team should have done their homework more diligently, as there are hundreds of federal government agency reports and, in particular, U.S. Patents of record, for managing weather systems. Many are listed below in the Weather Geoengineering / Chemtrail Database generated by this writer.

However, I think maybe I may be inclined to agree with Kollipara that chemtrails just may be a conspiracy—a real ‘true’ conspiracy to keep what’s going on day and night – and which darkens our skies (less sunlight hits earth now), plus precipitates all kinds of toxic crap falling onto earth—to keep the public from knowing what’s actually going on above our heads.

For decades weather control, AKA weather geoengineering, has been going on—it’s a given that patents verify. However, a complacent media, press, TV, probably some ‘politicos’ from previous administrations, select bureaucrats in government, government agencies per se, namely: US Air Force and Navy, researchers, and specialty contractors who build and carry out systems to fulfill the agenda—ALL have kept silent and definitely either apparently conspired or colluded to agree to keep silent—or else. Where are the whistleblowers? Could some wannabe whistleblowers be dead?

Why hasn’t any media outlet, investigative journalist or newspaper, the U.S. Congress or some foreign investigator/researcher questioned the sky trails during the last couple decades? Furthermore, why—whenever something crops up about chemtrails—is it immediately scandalized as ‘conspiracy’, rather than addressed with scientific facts and reported as news?

Below is a database of legal documentation (U.S. Patents) that evidences weather geoengineering is real. Furthermore, many patents cannot be employed or used unless there is aerial spraying.

First, we need to study two weather maps, which apparently show that there really is a split weather pattern in the continental USA.

“Two Pictures Worth More Than a Thousand Words!”

Source

“For any that are wondering how 2015 is shaping up for the Eastern US, the same scenario we saw in 2014 is being engineered all over again. The West fries with temperatures 20 degrees or more above normal with almost no rain as the Eastern US gets the toxic engineered cool-downs,” per Dane Wigington at GeoEngeeniringWatch.org, Jan. 24, 2015

Same source as above

The above global-climate-temperature map readily illustrates how the eastern parts of the USA and the North American continent apparently have become targeted areas for cold/rain/ice/snow weather geoengineering. Moreover, it supports the first map and the divide seen between the hot/dry west and the cold/wet east. That weather system probably can be accomplished only with aerial spraying of aerosolized chemicals and toxic elements, since natural weather patterns apparently don’t have ‘split personalities’. Documents from government and other mainstream resources, plus the investigative alternate press, confirm chemtrail activity, which really is weather geoengineering. Please see the database below.  

Weather Geoengineering / Chemtrail Database

List of U.S. Patents on Weather Modification / Aug. 8, 2012
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/an-extensive-list-of-patents/

For anyone doubting the existence of the phenomenon called ‘chemtrails’, please take the time to read through this extensive list of patents from the U.S. Patent and Trade Mark Office on equipment and processes used in aerosol spraying programs commonly referred to as “chemtrails” but scientifically called “weather geoengineering.”

United States Patent and Trademark Office 

1338343 – April 27, 1920 – Process And Apparatus For The Production of Intense Artificial Clouds, Fogs, or Mists
1619183 – March 1, 1927 – Process of Producing Smoke Clouds From Moving Aircraft
1631753 – June 7, 1927 – Electric Heater – Referenced in 3990987
1665267 – April 10, 1928 – Process of Producing Artificial Fogs
1892132 – December 27, 1932 – Atomizing Attachment For Airplane Engine Exhausts
1928963 – October 3, 1933 – Electrical System And Method
1957075 – May 1, 1934 – Airplane Spray Equipment
2097581 – November 2, 1937 – Electric Stream Generator – Referenced in 3990987
2409201 – October 15, 1946 – Smoke Producing Mixture
2476171 – July 18, 1945 – Smoke Screen Generator
2480967 – September 6, 1949 – Aerial Discharge Device
2550324 – April 24, 1951 – Process For Controlling Weather
2582678 – June 15, 1952 – Material Disseminating Apparatus For Airplanes
2591988 – April 8, 1952 – Production of TiO2 Pigments – Referenced in 3899144
2614083 – October 14, 1952 – Metal Chloride Screening Smoke Mixture
2633455 – March 31, 1953 – Smoke Generator
2688069 – August 31, 1954 – Steam Generator – Referenced in 3990987
2721495 – October 25, 1955 – Method And Apparatus For Detecting Minute Crystal Forming Particles Suspended in a Gaseous Atmosphere
2730402 – January 10, 1956 – Controllable Dispersal Device
2801322 – July 30, 1957 – Decomposition Chamber for Monopropellant Fuel – Referenced in 3990987
2881335 – April 7, 1959 – Generation of Electrical Fields
2908442 – October 13, 1959 – Method For Dispersing Natural Atmospheric Fogs And Clouds
2986360 – May 30, 1962 – Aerial Insecticide Dusting Device
2963975 – December 13, 1960 – Cloud Seeding Carbon Dioxide Bullet
3126155 – March 24, 1964 – Silver Iodide Cloud Seeding Generator – Referenced in 3990987
3127107 – March 31, 1964 – Generation of Ice-Nucleating Crystals
3131131 – April 28, 1964 – Electrostatic Mixing in Microbial Conversions
3174150 – March 16, 1965 – Self-Focusing Antenna System
3234357 – February 8, 1966 – Electrically Heated Smoke Producing Device
3274035 – September 20, 1966 – Metallic Composition For Production of Hydroscopic Smoke
3300721 – January 24, 1967 – Means For Communication Through a Layer of Ionized Gases
3313487 – April 11, 1967 – Cloud Seeding Apparatus
3338476 – August 29, 1967 – Heating Device For Use With Aerosol Containers – Referenced in 3990987
3410489 – November 12, 1968 – Automatically Adjustable Airfoil Spray System With Pump
3429507 – February 25, 1969 – Rainmaker
3432208 – November 7, 1967 – Fluidized Particle Dispenser
3441214 – April 29, 1969 – Method And Apparatus For Seeding Clouds
3445844 – May 20, 1969 – Trapped Electromagnetic Radiation Communications System
3456880 – July 22, 1969 – Method Of Producing Precipitation From The Atmosphere
3518670 June 30, 1970 – Artificial Ion Cloud
3534906 – October 20, 1970 – Control of Atmospheric Particles
3545677 – December 8, 1970 – Method of Cloud Seeding
3564253 – February 16, 1971 – System And Method For Irradiation Of Planet Surface Areas
3587966 – June 28, 1971 – Freezing Nucleation
3601312 – August 24, 1971 – Methods of Increasing The Likelihood oF Precipatation [sic]By The Artificial Introduction Of Sea Water Vapor Into The Atmosphere Winward Of An Air Lift Region
3608810 – September 28, 1971 – Methods of Treating Atmospheric Conditions
3608820 – September 20, 1971 – Treatment of Atmospheric Conditions by Intermittent Dispensing of Materials Therein
3613992 – October 19, 1971 – Weather Modification Method
3630950 – December 28, 1971 – Combustible Compositions For Generating Aerosols, Particularly Suitable For Cloud Modification And Weather Control And Aerosolization Process
USRE29142 – This patent is a reissue of patent US3630950 – Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process
3659785 – December 8, 1971 – Weather Modification Utilizing Microencapsulated Material
3666176 – March 3, 1972 – Solar Temperature Inversion Device
3677840 – July 18, 1972 – Pyrotechnics Comprising Oxide of Silver For Weather Modification Use
3722183 – March 27, 1973 – Device For Clearing Impurities From The Atmosphere
3769107 – October 30, 1973 – Pyrotechnic Composition For Generating Lead Based Smoke
3784099 – January 8, 1974 – Air Pollution Control Method
3785557 – January 15, 1974 – Cloud Seeding System
3795626 – March 5, 1974 – Weather Modification Process
3808595 – April 30, 1974 – Chaff Dispensing System
3813875 – June 4, 1974 – Rocket Having Barium Release System to Create Ion Clouds In The Upper Atmospphere [sic]
3835059 – September 10, 1974 – Methods of Generating Ice Nuclei Smoke Particles For Weather Modification And Apparatus Therefore
3835293 – September 10, 1974 – Electrical Heating Aparatus [sic] For Generating Super Heated Vapors
3877642 – April 15, 1975 – Freezing Nucleant
3882393 – May 6, 1975 – Communications System Utilizing Modulation of The Characteristic Polarization of The Ionosphere
3896993 – July 29, 1975 – Process For Local Modification of Fog And Clouds For Triggering Their Precipitation And For Hindering The Development of Hail Producing Clouds
3899129 – August 12, 1975 – Apparatus for generating ice nuclei smoke particles for weather modification
3899144 – August 12, 1975 – Powder contrail generation
3940059 – February 24, 1976 – Method For Fog Dispersion
3940060 – February 24, 1976 – Vortex Ring Generator
3990987 – November 9, 1976 – Smoke generator
3992628 – November 16, 1976 – Countermeasure system for laser radiation
3994437 – November 30, 1976 – Broadcast dissemination of trace quantities of biologically active chemicals
4042196 – August 16, 1977 – Method and apparatus for triggering a substantial change in earth characteristics and measuring earth changes
RE29,142 – February 22, 1977 – Reissue of: 03630950 – Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process
4035726 – July 12, 1977 – Method of controlling and/or improving high-latitude and other communications or radio wave surveillance systems by partial control of radio wave et al
4096005 – June 20, 1978 – Pyrotechnic Cloud Seeding Composition
4129252 – December 12, 1978 – Method and apparatus for production of seeding materials
4141274 – February 27, 1979 – Weather modification automatic cartridge dispenser
4167008 – September 4, 1979 – Fluid bed chaff dispenser
4347284 – August 31, 1982 – White cover sheet material capable of reflecting ultraviolet rays
4362271 – December 7, 1982 – Procedure for the artificial modification of atmospheric precipitation as well as compounds with a dimethyl sulfoxide base for use in carrying out said procedure
4402480 – September 6, 1983 – Atmosphere modification satellite
4412654 – November 1, 1983 – Laminar microjet atomizer and method of aerial spraying of liquids
4415265 – November 15, 1983 – Method and apparatus for aerosol particle absorption spectroscopy
4470544 – September 11, 1984 – Method of and Means for weather modification
4475927 – October 9, 1984 – Bipolar Fog Abatement System
4600147 – July 15, 1986 – Liquid propane generator for cloud seeding apparatus
4633714 – January 6, 1987 – Aerosol particle charge and size analyzer
4643355 – February 17, 1987 – Method and apparatus for modification of climatic conditions
4653690 – March 31, 1987 – Method of producing cumulus clouds
4684063 – August 4, 1987 – Particulates generation and removal
4686605 – August 11, 1987 – Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth’s atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere
4704942 – November 10, 1987 – Charged Aerosol
4712155 – December 8, 1987 – Method and apparatus for creating an artificial electron cyclotron heating region of plasma
4744919 – May 17, 1988 – Method of dispersing particulate aerosol tracer
4766725 – August 30, 1988 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
4829838 – May 16, 1989 – Method and apparatus for the measurement of the size of particles entrained in a gas
4836086 – June 6, 1989 – Apparatus and method for the mixing and diffusion of warm and cold air for dissolving fog
4873928 – October 17, 1989 – Nuclear-sized explosions without radiation
4948257 – August 14, 1990 – Laser optical measuring device and method for stabilizing fringe pattern spacing
1338343– August 14, 1990 – Process and Apparatus for the production of intense artificial Fog
4999637 – March 12, 1991 – Creation of artificial ionization clouds above the earth
5003186 – March 26, 1991 – Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming
5005355 – April 9, 1991 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
5038664 – August 13, 1991 – Method for producing a shell of relativistic particles at an altitude above the earths [sic] surface
5041760 – August 20, 1991 – Method and apparatus for generating and utilizing a compound plasma configuration
5041834 – August 20, 1991 – Artificial ionospheric mirror composed of a plasma layer which can be tilted
5056357 – October 15, 1991- Acoustic method for measuring properties of a mobile medium
5059909 – October 22, 1991 – Determination of particle size and electrical charge
5104069 – April 14, 1992 – Apparatus and method for ejecting matter from an aircraft
5110502 – May 5, 1992 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
5156802 – October 20, 1992 – Inspection of fuel particles with acoustics
5174498 – December 29, 1992 – Cloud Seeding
5148173 – September 15, 1992 – Millimeter wave screening cloud and method
5245290 – September 14, 1993 – Device for determining the size and charge of colloidal particles by measuring electroacoustic effect
5286979 – February 15, 1994 – Process for absorbing ultraviolet radiation using dispersed melanin
5296910 – March 22, 1994 – Method and apparatus for particle analysis
5327222 – July 5, 1994 – Displacement information detecting apparatus
5357865 – October 25, 1994 – Method of cloud seeding
5360162 – November 1, 1994 – Method and composition for precipitation of atmospheric water
5383024 – January 17, 1995 – Optical wet steam monitor
5425413 – June 20, 1995 – Method to hinder the formation and to break-up overhead atmospheric inversions, enhance ground level air circulation and improve urban air quality
5434667 – July 18, 1995 – Characterization of particles by modulated dynamic light scattering
5441200 – August 15, 1995 – Tropical cyclone disruption
5486900 – January 23, 1996 – Measuring device for amount of charge of toner and image forming apparatus having the measuring device
5556029 – September 17, 1996 – Method of hydrometeor dissipation (clouds)
5628455 – May 13, 1997 – Method and apparatus for modification of supercooled fog
5631414 – May 20, 1997 – Method and device for remote diagnostics of ocean-atmosphere system state
5639441 – June 17, 1997 – Methods for fine particle formation
5762298 – June 9, 1998 – Use of artificial satellites in earth orbits adaptively to modify the effect that solar radiation would otherwise have on earth’s weather
5912396 – June 15, 1999 – System and method for remediation of selected atmospheric conditions
5922976 – July 13, 1999 – Method of measuring aerosol particles using automated mobility-classified aerosol detector
5949001 – September 7, 1999 – Method for aerodynamic particle size analysis
5984239 – November 16, 1999 – Weather modification by artificial satellite
6025402 – February 15, 2000 – Chemical composition for effectuating a reduction of visibility obscuration, and a detoxifixation [sic]of fumes and chemical fogs in spaces of fire origin
6030506 – February 29, 2000 – Preparation of independently generated highly reactive chemical species
6034073 – March 7, 2000 – Solvent detergent emulsions having antiviral activity
6045089 – April 4, 2000 – Solar-powered airplane
6056203 – May 2, 2000 – Method and apparatus for modifying supercooled clouds
6110590 – August 29, 2000 – Synthetically spun silk nanofibers and a process for making the same
6263744 – July 24, 2001 – Automated mobility-classified-aerosol detector
6281972 – August 28, 2001 – Method and apparatus for measuring particle-size distribution
6315213 – November 13, 2001 – Method of modifying weather
6382526 – May 7, 2002 – Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers
6408704 – June 25, 2002 – Aerodynamic particle size analysis method and apparatus
6412416 – July 2, 2002 – Propellant-based aerosol generation devices and method
6520425 – February 18, 2003 – Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers
6539812 – April 1, 2003 – System for measuring the flow-rate of a gas by means of ultrasound
6553849 – April 29, 2003 – Electrodynamic particle size analyzer
6569393 – May 27, 2003 – Method and device for cleaning the atmosphere

An Extensive List of Patents on weather modification 1920 to Oct 5 2012
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/links-to-geoengineering-patents/

The most questionable of any technologies probably involved in weather geoengineering, which is couched as “military assets,” is what’s known as HAARP. It has/had two components: 1) the Tesla Weapon Platform SBX-1 sea-based, and 2) the land-base in SW Alaska, which supposedly closed in May 2013. However, there’s some talk that the land-based HAARP may have been replaced with satellite technology, so that’s why the Alaska HAARP ‘campus’ (photo below) was closed. Can anyone verify that there’s a purported satellite replacement for the Gakona, Alaska, site? 

HAARP patent

Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth’s atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere #4,686,605 / Aug 11, 1987

Here is a YouTube with an independent narrative that parses satellite images of Hurricane Sandy Oct. 26, 2012 wherein what’s described as HAARP frequencies, aka infrasonic undulations, show up to steer the storm Sandy. Chemtrails can be seen in the satellite relays as being sprayed during the hurricane!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-ts=1421914688&v=o4P7Kr17RX8&x-yt-cl=84503534&feature=player_embedded#t=631

Background on HAARP by a noted international expert on radiation
http://www.globalresearch.ca/remembering-rosalie-bertell/31448

Sister Dr. Rosalie Bertell, “Background on HAARP,” 1996.
http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/212/45492.html

There are HAARP installation sites around the world, as this map indicates. 

(Source)

Video of possible “Sound of HAARP”: light and sound in action


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsgrRmHW8ro&x-yt-ts=1421914688&x-yt-cl=84503534&feature=player_detailpage#t=71

Here’s a NASA Release 04-140 “Clouds caused by aircraft exhaust may warm the U.S. climate” (April 27, 2004) [Emphasis added]

NASA scientists have found that cirrus clouds, formed by contrails from aircraft engine exhaust, are capable of increasing average surface temperatures enough to account for a warming trend in the United States that occurred between 1975 and 1994. (Source)

[Emphasis added. So, who’s really responsible for increasing the planet’s surface temperatures?]

Patent 3613992 – Weather Modification Method (patented Oct. 19, 1971)

Science Daily Geoengineering could disrupt rainfall patterns June 6, 2012
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120606092715.htm

Regional Climate Response to Solar Radiation Management

Ricke, K. L., M. G. Morgan, and M. R. Allen. 2010. Regional climate response to solar radiation management. Nature Geoscience 3:537-541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo915

Solar Radiation Management

“Stratospheric aerosol geoengineering” (SAG), AKA “Solar radiation management” (SRM).

“A primary stated goal of the geoengineering programs is to provide a “solar shield” to slow “runaway climate change” by spraying tens of millions of tons of highly toxic metal nano particulates (a nanometer is 1/1,000,000,000 of a meter) into the atmosphere from jet aircraft.” [Emphasis added] (Source)

The Chemical Ice Nucleation Process

“Engineered Snowstorms” and How They Do It
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/engineered-snowstorms-what-are-they-spraying/

The Knollenberg Patent
http://www.ptodirect.com/Results/Patents?query=PN/3613992

Make certain to check out all links and videos in both of the above.

Weather Modification Studies

Hubbard, Kenneth G., “Weather Modification Studies: The Potential for Creating and Utilizing Ice Crystals in Weather Modification Activities” (1977). Reports. Paper 404.
http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_rep/404

WEATHER MODIFICATION STUDIES: THE POTENTIAL FOR CREATING AND UTILIZING ICE CRYSTALS IN WEATHER MODIFICATION ACTIVITIES, 17 page report

Vonnegut, B., 1947: The nucleation of ice formation by silver iodide. J. Appl. Phys., ~, 593-595.

Wikipedia Climate Engineering webpage
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_engineering

Geoengineering: a national strategic plan for research on the potential effectiveness, feasibility, and consequences of climate remediation technologies. Bipartisan Policy Center, Washington, D.C., USA.

Government Accountability Office. 2010. Climate change: preliminary observations on geoengineering science, federal efforts, and governance issues. Report GAO-10-546T. GAO, Washington, D.C., USA.

Government Accountability Office. 2011. Climate engineering: technical status, future directions, and potential responses. Report GAO-11-71. GAO, Washington, D.C., USA.

Lenton, T. M., and N. E. Vaughan. 2009. The radiative forcing potential of different climate geoengineering options. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 9:5539-5561. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5539-2009

Lin, A. C. 2009. Geoengineering governance. Issues in Legal Scholarship 8(3):1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1539-8323.1112

US Air Force / Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025
http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf [a US Air Force document]

Planetary Weapons and Military Weather Modification: Chemtrails, Atmospheric Geoengineering and Environmental Warfare
http://www.globalresearch.ca/military-weather-modification-chemtrails-atmospheric-geoengineering-and-environmental-warfare/5356630

Weather Modification Incorporated  
http://www.weathermodification.com/

“Let us help you better manage your atmospheric and water resources.”

Weather Modification Association
http://www.weathermodification.org/

Chemtrails: The apparent weather management tool of choice for weather geoengineering because without aerosol sprays, not much can happen.

Chemtrails Exposed by Pilots, Doctors, Scientists Soil Water Tested High in Aluminum Barium
Testimony presented before the Shasta County, California, Board of Supervisors, Redding CA, August 2014(Source)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HP_IvBRhGh8

Airplanes spraying chemtrails
https://www.google.com/search?q=airplanes+spraying+chemtrails&biw=979&bih=531&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=xs3FVLLgO8O5ggTI-4DQDQ&ved=0CDMQsAQ

Airlines spraying chemtrails: “Does the Airline You Fly Spray Chemtrails?”
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/05/does-airline-you-fly-spray-chemtrails.html

What in the World Are They Spraying (a full length film)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-ts=1421914688&v=jf0khstYDLA&x-yt-cl=84503534&feature=player_embedded#t=65

December 2014: A Month of “Weather Bombs” or world-wide weather anomalies 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCYfQmk5yao&x-yt-ts=1421914688&x-yt-cl=84503534&feature=player_detailpage#t=440

Massive wild life die offs; 70 foot waves on the coasts of Ireland and the UK; rare Los Angeles, CA tornado; the simultaneous mysterious loud booms and aerial noises in the USA and the UK. For years now, strange sky noises are being reported globally.

A Global Agenda

Fleet of aircraft spraying black carbon trails over Europe


https://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-ts=1421914688&v=cJe-FIsZOMY&x-yt-cl=84503534&feature=player_embedded#t=193

Note that the first images were recorded over Bulgaria with later clips over Germany, South Serbia, Romania, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic, as stated and posted at http://www.aircrap.org/2015/01/20/global-warming-busted-fleet-of-jets-spray-black-carbon-chemtrails/ [Please make certain to check out that entire website!]

The video of planes spraying black carbon trails originally was posted at Look-Up.org.UK in the United Kingdom, European Union. Carbon! Anything to do with carbon taxes coming to the EU’s future? See information about the USA carbon tax. http://www.carbontax.org/

Specific Weather Modifications in California

Weather Modification Operations in California Oct. 1, 1963-Sept. 30, 1964 dated May 1965
http://www.water.ca.gov/waterdatalibrary/docs/historic/Bulletins/Bulletin_16/Bulletin_16__1965.pdf

Denver Post Newspaper

When I searched the DP archives for information about weather modification in 1965, there were 57 matches that included the following states: CA (14 articles), IN (7), CT (4), KS (4), AZ (3), IA (3), OH (3), PA (3), SD (3), NY (2), TX (2), UT (2), AR (1), CO (1), IL (1), MO (1), NM (1), OK (1), WI (1) http://go.newspapers.com/results.php?query=1965+modify+natural+precipitation

Advertisement of modifying natural precipitation by artificial means

Here’s a Public Notice advertisement that appeared in some newspaper [probably in the State of Oregon] that gave official notice of what was going to happen, i.e., Water Development Corporation had a license (No. 54 issued by the State of Oregon) “to engage in operations to modify natural precipitation by artificial means, for and on behalf of Morrow County Weather Research Association, located at Echo, Oregon” for the period Oct. 1, 1965 to Oct. 31, 1966. [Emphasis added] 

Chinese scientists create major snowstorm / November 11, 2009

http://www.news.com.au/technology/chinese-scientists-create-second-artificial-snowstorm-in-beijing/story-e6frfro0-1225796559341

Catherine J Frompovich’s articles about Chemtrails and Weather Geoengineering

What’s to Blame for Our Dying Planet? Jan. 18, 2015
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/01/whats-to-blame-for-our-dying-planet.html

plus the surprise

Does the Airline You Fly Spray Chemtrails? May 19, 2014
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/05/does-airline-you-fly-spray-chemtrails.html

What’s With the Weather and Chemtrails? May 2, 2014
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/05/whats-with-weather-and-chemtrails.html

Who’s Mucking With the Weather? May 19, 2014
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/05/whos-mucking-with-weather.html

Open Letter to the U.S. Congress, EPA, NOAA, NASA and all involved in Geoengineering including the Air Force February 27, 2014
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/02/open-letter-to-us-congress-epa-noaa.html

Lastly, there’s this document wherein apparent weather strategies seem to come into play.

NASA’s FUTURE STRATEGIC ISSUES/FUTURE WARFARE [Circa 2025]
‘The Bots, Borgs, & Humans Welcome You to 2025 A.D.’

Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist
NASA Langley Research Center

Originally published online by NASA prior to 9-11-01 but since removed.

The person who emailed it said, “Our side preserved it in cyberspace” at

The above is what appears to be PowerPoint presentation.

Page 43 talks about Micro Dust Weaponry for Lungs [very scary stuff. Will that be aerosolized and sprayed from aircraft too?]

On page 41 we find this: Sensor Swarms: Smart dust; nanotags everywhere/everything for ID and status Information; Co-opted insects.

Page 82 has some very disconcerting stuff: Unconventional Nuc [Nuke] Delivery including tidal waves and earthquakes [Very scary stuff on this page. Are they talking about creating tidal waves and earthquakes? Isn’t that ‘weather’ related? Has either ever been employed?]

But, page 55 “What is Apparently “Legal” [and they can do without oversight. Will weather geoengineering fall into that category and be considered “An act of God?” Is that why they deny chemtrail existence or weather geoengineering, and grossly claim it the work of conspiracy theorists? Do the real weather controllers want taxpayers to believe that no one has been able to control the weather, a most likely and logical conclusion? However, check out this:

US Air Force / Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025
http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf [a US Air Force document] ]

There’s even a textbook for USA children that teaches about creating an atmosphere sunscreen using jet planes and fuel to add particles to the atmosphere. Chemtrails by another name?

Science I: Essential Interaction
http://www.chemtrails911.com/docs/Centre%20Pointe%20Learning,%20Inc.htm

“In the Level 1 Science book, “Essential Interactions” by Centre Point Learning, Inc., a photo of a jet is titled “Particle Air” and is followed with: ‘Could we deliberately add patrticles [sic—s/b particles] to the atmosphere? Jet engines running on richer fuel would add particles to the atmosphere to create a sunscreen’.”
http://www.chemtrails911.com/science_book.htm

A logical question should be: What’s being added to jet jet fuel to make it richer? See the list of what’s been analyzed from sprays and appears on the “Stop Spraying California!” website
http://www.stopsprayingcalifornia.com/What_are_they_Spraying.php.

With all the above documentation, which represents not even one-tenth of what’s probably out there, who do you think are the conspiracy theorists?

Catherine retired from researching and writing, but felt compelled to write this article. 

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Activist Post

Your Home Appliances Will Soon Be Remotely Controlled By The Government

Natural News
by Daniel Barker

Electrical-Outlet

Increasingly, our freedom and autonomy are threatened by those who seek to monitor and control every aspect of our daily lives. George Orwell’s “Big Brother” from the novel 1984 is a pale threat in comparison to the dystopian reality our leaders which have created for us since that book was published more than six decades ago.

Orwell clearly foresaw a future in which the state watches over and micromanages the lives of its subjects, but even he could scarcely have imagined the degree of surveillance and control that technology would make possible.

I also believe that he hoped we would avoid allowing this to happen — it seems clear that the book was designed as a warning, as were many others that were published in the 20th century. Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 and Huxley’s Brave New World are just two famous examples that come to mind.

One of the problems is that our freedoms are taken away incrementally, in small units and in the name of “national security” or “technological progress” — we don’t see the cumulative effect until it’s too late to do anything about it.

The latest encroachment on our privacy and daily actions comes in the form of what is being called “smart grid” technology.

UK utility company Northern Powergrid Holdings Co. (which is owned by mega-billionaire Warren Buffett) is cooperating with Siemens AG towards a planned test of a smart grid which will be able, according to Bloomberg.com, “to control when consumer appliances will be used in the home.

“Being able to better manage when electricity flows allows utilities to lower consumer costs by reducing the need for new equipment, and to better handle surges and gaps from intermittent sources such as wind and solar. The pilot program, known as the Customer-Led Network Revolution, involves just 12,000 households in the U.K. and is one of only a few such projects being tested worldwide.”

It seems clear that the term “Customer-Led Network Revolution” is designed to give the impression that consumers are somehow behind the implementation of this technology, which is highly unlikely indeed.

The truth is that the smart grid will not only allow the providers of electricity control over consumer usage but will also provide a detailed picture of the customer’s energy consumption habits.

This may seem innocuous enough on the surface, but it’s not hard to imagine this ability being used to invade privacy and keep an even closer watch over the daily activities of citizens.

Soon, the authorities may be examining your behavior at home in detail: “What’s he doing in his workshop at 3am? Could it be criminal activity?”, etc.

It’s interesting how the Warren Buffetts of this world seem so intent on helping us manage our lives. It seems very considerate, but I often wonder what the real purpose is.

And, as Melissa Melton of The Daily Sheeple points out, why is it that the powers that be are so concerned with helping us save money on electricity, when they actively discourage any efforts towards independence of the grid on our parts?

In Melton’s words:

“Smart grid technology is one more rung on the ladder to a complete technocratic slave grid where austerity and artificial scarcity rule the day.”

In some states in the U.S. (including Florida and Texas), it is virtually illegal to live off the grid. There have been several cases where those who have managed to live independently off the power grid have been treated as criminals.

We once lived in a society where self-reliance and independence were considered positive qualities. It seems that nowadays these traits are deemed not only as out of fashion, but as direct threats to the central authority.

Sources include:

http://www.thedailysheeple.com

http://www.bloomberg.com

http://www.inquisitr.com

Natural News

Millions Of Cars Tracked Across US In ‘Massive’ Real-Time DEA Spy Program

The Guardian
by Rory Carroll

American Civil Liberties Union warns scanning of license plates by Drug Enforcement Agency is building a repository of all drivers’ movements

traffic
The DEA database has the potential to track every driver’s movements, the American Civil Liberties Union has warned. Photograph: DA Barnes/Alamy

The United States government is tracking the movement of vehicles around the country in a clandestine intelligence-gathering programme that has been condemned as a further official exercise to build a database on people’s lives.

The Drug Enforcement Administration was monitoring license plates on a “massive” scale, giving rise to “major civil liberties concerns”, the American Civil Liberties Union said on Monday night, citing DEA documents obtained under freedom of information.

“This story highlights yet another way government security agencies are seeking to quietly amplify their powers using new technologies,” Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst with ACLU, told the Guardian.

“On this as on so many surveillance issues, we can take action, put in place some common sense limits or sit back and let our society be transformed into a place we won’t recognize – or probably much like.”

The advocacy group said the DEA records it obtained from the justice department were heavily redacted and incomplete.

“These records do, however, offer documentation that this program is a major DEA initiative that has the potential to track our movements around the country. With its jurisdiction and its finances, the federal government is uniquely positioned to create a centralized repository of all drivers’ movements across the country — and the DEA seems to be moving toward doing just that.”

If license plate readers continued to proliferate without restriction and the DEA held license plate reader data for extended periods the agency would soon possess a detailed and invasive depiction of people’s lives, the ACLU said, especially if combined with other surveillance data such as bulk phone records or information gleaned by the US Marshals Service using aircraft that mimic cellphone towers.

“Data-mining the information, an unproven law enforcement technique that the DEA has begun to use here, only exacerbates these concerns, potentially tagging people as criminals without due process,” the ACLU warned.

The Wall Street Journal, citing official documents and anonymous officials, reported that the programme built a national database to track vehicles in real time and stored hundreds of millions of records about motorists.

The primary goal was to seize cars, cash and other assets to combat drug trafficking but the database expanded to monitor vehicles associated with other potential crimes, it said.

Officials have publicly acknowledged they track vehicles near the Mexican border to combat drug trafficking.

But the database’s expansion “thoughout the United States”, as one DEA email put it, worried Senator Patrick Leahy, who sits on the Senate judiciary committee.

“The fact that this intrusive technology is potentially being used to expand the reach of the government’s asset forfeiture efforts is of even greater concern,’’ he told the Wall Street Journal.

Leahy called for additional accountability and said Americans should not have to fear that “their locations and movements are constantly being tracked and stored in a massive government database”.

A spokesman for the justice department, which includes the DEA, said the program complied with federal law. “It is not new that the DEA uses the license-plate reader program to arrest criminals and stop the flow of drugs in areas of high trafficking intensity,’’ the spokesman said.

According to the ACLU, the government-run national license plate tracking program dates from 2008. Information had trickled out over the years but far too little was known about the program, the ACLU said.

The Guardian

“Technological Arms Race” Has Captured Global Finance: “Trading Once Took Minutes, Now Handled in Mere Nanoseconds by Computers”

SHTFplan
by Mac Slavo

monstermind1

As it becomes increasingly clear that fewer and fewer hands control the wealth of the planet, the manipulation of the market seems obvious enough.

No doubt, technology is playing an important role, but few have any real idea about the extent to which the notion of day trading from the floor of some market is completely obsolete, and how completely orchestrated things really are.

Today, high frequency trading is conducted by computer algorithms that predict market behavior and make rapid investment decisions mere mortals could never keep up with.

In 2012, Zero Hedge reported that a whopping 84% of ALL stock trades are conducted by high frequency trading computer systems. 84%!!

A new study of related technology patents confirms that this is taking place on a larger scale that anyone even realized:

The way financial assets are traded, and the nature of the markets themselves, has dramatically changed over the last two decades, says study co-author Dr Ivan Diaz-Rainey of the University’s Department of Accountancy and Finance.

“Trading a share-once a hands-on transaction taking around two minutes-is now handled in mere nanoseconds by computers in many markets around the world,” he says.

“A ‘technology arms race’ is well underway as firms vie to shave even more time off trading and maintain their competitive edge. But it’s not just about trading speed. We’re seeing technology used more when firms are first issuing securities and even the use of neural networks in portfolio selection.”

Yes, neural networks. As if the Federal Reserve era of finance wasn’t skewed enough already, for some time now there have been computers actively learning how to better game the system (and you).

And they have taken over almost everything.

A paper titled Portfolio Selection with Predicted Returns Using Neural Networks:

The Markowitz’s Portfolio Selection Model defines the return and risk variables as first-order statistical measurements, which have made this model to be known as mean-variance model. We carried out investment simulations using real data with the Markowitz’s model and our model. These simulations shown that the prediction-quadratic deviation model can achieve a return 12.39% higher than the mean-variance model.

Our experiments show that … the prediction-quadratic deviation model selects higher proportions of stocks with predicted returns higher than the mean returns used in the original model, and also because it can pick solutions on regions of the return-risk space that are unknown for the classical model.

Keep in mind that these formulas for computer-based investments are literally getting better all the time, as they are learning as they go. Moreover, they are starting with awareness of many market factors the average person knows nothing about, and even insiders can’t realistically factor into human-only trading.

Automated trading strategies are drawing from a wealth of data about market performance and consumer trends to making investment decisions in a fraction of a second.

In a paper titled, “Making markets: infrastructures, engineers and the moral technologies of finance,” sociologists from the London School of Economics argue that:

The electronic order book grounded the single most important qualitative revolution in recent finance: its adoption displaced trading from the floors of stock exchanges onto global electronic trading networks, changing the spatial scope and interactional character of the marketplace. Its adoption also transformed the speed and politics of financial markets, as illustrated by the rise of automated trading strategies that exploit the affordances of computers and communication networks to generate profits in fractions of a second.

Between 2000 and 2009, the aggregate value of trading in global stock markets grew by 61%; the number of trades, however, grew by 700%. Trades today are smaller than what they were ten years ago, and they take place at higher speeds — turnover velocity 1 in most mature markets is generally above 80% (the NYSE Euronex and NASDAQ are notable examples: their turnover velocities are 138.5% and 300% respectively).

This means that those firms using this and other emerging technologies, which has only come to light through an investigation into the development of industry-related patents, have a definite edge on the market.

Financial trading expert and critic Max Keiser called the entire system a hologram, capable of masking deflation and inflation through the feedback loop of these computer algorithms, programmed behind the scenes to manipulate for human interests:

In place of reliable price signals (based on the supply and demand of buying and selling) we have price signals that are generated by computer algorithms; i.e., computers executing program trading, high frequency trading and algorithmic trading — that account for up to 70% of the trading activity on the NYSE (or 100%, if you consider any shares traded — not involved in program trading — can’t buck the pricing monopoly of the computers).

Program traders have a virtually infinite line of credit, pay virtually zero commissions, and are backed by banks on Wall St. with strong political connections who are ready to bail out any losing bets these computers make.

Plus, the computers are able to do something normal buyers and sellers can’t do. They can pick a price they want a security to trade at and then fill in all the necessary trading volume needed to get the price of the security to that point. In other words, you can program computers to rig markets.

In this new rigged market capitalist model, the corrupt bank picks the price it wants a security to trade at and the computers buy and sell with each other until that price is reached; thus providing an audit trail of trades that looks on the surface like actual price discovery.

And each price manufactured by computers generates a reaction price in every other security and commodity as the rigged market price signal ripples throughout the interconnected securities market around the world.

The average investor just doesn’t stand a chance, unless they are part of the system that is rapidly buying up and developing these investment technologies.

The researchers have equated this to a technological arms race that is empowering the already dominant ‘incumbent’ firms on Wall Street and London, and also making way for influence by emerging tech-trading firms:

New Zealand researchers said Monday they have traced the origins of a “technological arms race” that gives Wall Street an advantage in the international markets.

The University of Otago researchers scanned the United States Patent and Trademark Office database for market infrastructure (MI) patents for software or hardware using in trading filed between January 1976 and December 2013.

[…]

“Established economic theory tells us that new firms will play a leading role in transforming an industry. However, traditional finance firms are powerful and commercially astute so it is reasonable to assume at least some will have responded aggressively by patenting new MI technologies themselves,” said Diaz-Rainey.

“We identified software companies and smaller brokerage firms that have invested heavily in technology internally and through market acquisitions, right alongside major incumbent firms like the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and Goldman Sachs.

The study revealed that the leading MI patentee was not an established firm, but a private software firm, Trading Technologies International.

[…]

“At a basic level, all markets are increasingly integrated — if Wall Street sneezes, New Zealand is likely to catch a financial cold. So I guess a question is do we want to move towards this?” said Diaz-Rainey.

By the way, Trading Technologies International lead by CEO Rick Lane, who worked for Google after making significant developments in the high frequency trading field, before rejoining Trading Technologies. He has extensive experience in the very areas he is in the midst of transforming:

Rick worked for a proprietary trading firm, where he developed trading algorithms for the Chicago futures markets. Before entering the financial sector, he worked at consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton, where he developed defense-analysis software for the U.S. Department of Defense and other government agencies.

The question is, with a market this sophisticated and so … tilted, err… rigged for the establishment players and their cronies, how long will it be until the next crisis hits, and takes everything from the little people?

Or will this system ever be recognized as inherently corrupt, flawed and dismantled in time to save the economies of the globe?

Because this technology has everything to do with the looming and completely disastrous derivatives weight that could come crashing down with absolute force at any time. Based on little more than a complex illusion. Ponder the thought.

SHTFplan

Millions of GMO Insects Set for Release in Florida Keys

InfoWars
by ANTHONY GUCCIARDI

Cross-bred with the herpes simplex virus and E. coli bacteria

mosquito
Image Credits: agder, Flickr

As war wages over the genetic modification of the food supply, mega biotech companies have already begun launching campaigns to release millions of GMO insects in the Florida Keys region that have been cross-bred with the herpes simplex virus and E. coli bacteria.

With petitions against the release already amassing 130,000 signatures, British researchers are currently seeking government approval to initiate the unprecedented release. It was back in December of 2014 that we first revealed to you that these mosquitoes were already being shipped inside the United States, showing the confidence of the biotech lobbyists and researchers that they are in fact going to be granted the stamp of approval by the Food and Drug Administration to release the GMO insects.

As the Associated Press reports today on the issue, we are entering into a whole new territory of genetically modified creations:

“Enter Oxitec, a British biotech firm that patented a method of breeding Aedes aegypti with fragments of genes from the herpes simplex virus and E. coli bacteria as well as coral and cabbage. This synthetic DNA is commonly used in laboratory science and is thought to pose no significant risks to other animals, but it kills mosquito larvae.

Oxitec’s lab workers manually remove modified females, aiming to release only males, which don’t bite for blood like females do. The modified males then mate with wild females whose offspring die, reducing the population.

Oxitec has built a breeding lab in Marathon and hopes to release its mosquitoes in a Key West neighborhood this spring.”

With the seemingly-imminent roll out of GMO pigs alongside the release of genetically modified insects within the United States, it is now obvious that the new war over the supply exists not only over staple crops and seeds — but the oncoming wave of genetically augmented animal and insect life.

Would you be concerned with being stung by a genetically modified mosquito? Voice your opinion in the comments below. 

InfoWars

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,580 other followers

%d bloggers like this: