New World Order
New Eastern Outlook
by Vladimir Terehov
The abbreviation USA occupies almost a central place in public rhetoric and texts devoted to various aspects of world politics. In recent years, even just mentioning this abbreviation in Russia has provoked strong polarised emotions, which are rather indirectly related to the complicated content that it contains within.
Most of those who hold emotions such as adoration currently constitute a marginal political trend and hardly deserve to be involved in any disputes.
A much more serious problem is the massive dominance of the varying degrees of heated negative emotions. The latter is direct consequence of an inadequate response to the two most important circumstances accompanying the end of the Cold War.
The first case is due to the persistent pain caused by the defeat of the Soviet Union in the Cold War. In this sense the frequent attempts by adults to ignore the obvious formal evidence of the aforesaid deplorable fact in an emotional and childish way are not fitting.
The second case is related to the other (and also undisputed) fact that since 1991 up to the present day the United States has played a “particularly unique and leading” role in the new emerging global game. And it is not because President Barack Obama said so or because the same words (addressed, incidentally, more to the internal, not external audience) are written in certain official documents.
It is so, because at that’s the way the cards were dealt at the end of the previous game; and to be “offended” by this fact is no less senseless than to get upset at bad weather. Besides, the obvious existence of such formal signs such as the highest levels of economic development and military power in the world, and the (ongoing) possession of the potential of “soft power” are significant justification for the current US claims to the world leadership.
Apparently, many people feel the depressing effect of living in such a reality. But before trying to find a “quick-fix” for the new hierarchy in international relations, it is necessary to answer a number of questions ourselves.
The most fundamental of them is not so much related to the assessment of ammunition, available to the potential “reformer”, but to the issue, long-debated in academic circles, of the advantages and disadvantages of the existing “unipolar” and the future “multi-polar” world order.
No single solution to this problem has been found, and it may not even exist because of the diversity of responses to another question: “what is good and what is bad” (for whom and from what point of view)?
In particular, it may be assumed that the reaction to some of the consequences of establishing a “multipolarity” (such as those affecting the problems of strategic stability in the world) will be the sacramental phrase “the achievement of the dream” of a citizen, who is not very wise.
There seems to be one indisputable thing: global leadership is such a burden that it is more and more obviously beginning to press upon its current holder. Notwithstanding the public ‘cheese for the camera’ smiles.
Washington is currently solving the important (but intermediate) issue of whom to place as leader instead of itself in the Greater Middle East (GME), that is, in the can of worms opened by them (where it is unclear who is with whom, and who is fighting for what).
Washington itself, however, is going to focus on parrying the main and quite traditional in nature (rather than mythical or “unconventional”) challenge, which is brought about by the fact that China is transforming into a second global power.
The NEO has already discussed the struggle between the supporters the continued global dominance of the United States (“primarists”) and those who propose a sharp reduction of US involvement in many problems of the world, suggesting focus be paid to the main ones. During the currently unfolding presidential race in the United States, these discussions have begun to move from the sphere of scientific discussion to real politics.
When solving an issue it is sometimes useful to mentally consider the extreme (even very unlikely) development scenario of the process, which itself provoked the very appearance of the issue.
Since in this case we are talking about the evaluation of the place and role of the USA in the modern world order, then such (purely qualitative) assessment may be made by considering Washington’s “extreme” response to new world trends.
Out of all these, one of the main trends is the almost universal increase in anti-American sentiment, and an extreme response to this trend could be expressed in the following wording: “You are all malicious, you do not appreciate my efforts, I’m going back home, you can all live without me.”
Thus, the above-mentioned dream of a particular person will come true, obviously, to his great happiness. But there would be no happiness in China, which is now the main geopolitical opponent of the United States.
Even with the recent US military provocations in the area of the South China Sea, which is extremely important for PRC, and plots around Taiwan. Even in the context of the comprehensive support that the US provides to the largest regional opponents of China, such as India and Japan (not to mention the Philippines and Vietnam) as well as to an exiled Dalai Lama XIV as the spiritual leader of the world Buddhism, and, in particular, of the Tibetans.
For the ancient Chinese culture enables China to separate the wheat from the chaff in the current political fuss. The search for such “grains” is reflected in an article under a notable title “Why China wants the US in Asia,” published in one of the recent editions of the world’s largest financial newspaper Nikkei Asian Review.
Answering his own question, whether the purpose of China’s policy is “to squeeze the US out of Asia,” the author unequivocally says “no”, in spite of the opposite opinion widespread in the American establishment. The author of the article’s remark that the opinion above is based “on powerful emotions, not on logic” is remarkable.
The main and well-grounded argument, proving the erroneousness of the said sentiment in the US political circles, is that a hypothetical US withdrawal from Asia would lead to the inevitable consequence of a dramatic complication for China in the task of providing national security.
For in the place occupied by the present main geopolitical opponent of PRC, with whom the rules of the game have been more or less established, several new ones would certainly appear. The author of the said article indicated “Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and, possibly, Taiwan.” But India and Australia can quite possibly be added to this list.
Beijing has a rather complicated story of relations with several of these neighbouring countries; and the present ongoing process of China’s transition into a global power is perceived by almost each of them as a threat to their national security. Despite the obvious benefits of developing economic relations with China.
If the US-Japan military-political alliance is terminated it is most definite that the process of Japan’s militarisation will be drastically accelerated.
Moreover, it is safe to say that in this case, Tokyo would immediately launch a program to develop its own nuclear weapons. Such a possibility was discussed as early as in 1950s and was declined only upon receiving US security guarantees. According to the experts of IAEA, Japan needs not decades (as Iran), but a few months, to start the production of high-quality nuclear weapons.
China undoubtedly takes all these factors into account while building its political course with the USA.
In conclusion, it should be noted that the United States is not the “conscientious policeman” of the modern world, because the state of the world dictates the state of the policeman. Nevertheless, the hopes of those who believe that everything would be better without this (rather imperfect) guardian of the world order, are exceedingly unlikely to come true.
Vladimir Terekhov, expert on the issues of the Asia-Pacific region, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook“.
by Colin Todhunter
There is a global depopulation agenda. The plan is to remove the ‘undesirables’, ‘the poor’ and others deemed to be ‘unworthy’ and a drain on finite resources. However, according to Rosemary Mason, the plan isn’t going to work because an anthropogenic mass extinction is already underway that will affect all life on the planet and both rich and poor alike. Humans will struggle to survive the phenomenon.
A new paper by Rosemary A Mason in the ‘Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry’, indicates that a ‘sixth extinction’ is under way (the Holocene extinction, sometimes called the Sixth Extinction, is a name describing the ongoing extinction of species during the present Holocene epoch – since around 10,000 BCE). In her paper, ‘The sixth mass extinction and chemicals in the environment: our environmental deficit is now beyond nature’s ability to regenerate’, she argues that loss of biodiversity is the most urgent of the environmental problems, as biodiversity is critical to ecosystem services and human health. And the main culprit is the modern chemical-intensive industrialised system of food and agriculture.
Mason asserts there is a growing threat from the release of hormone-disrupting chemicals that could even be shifting the human sex ratio and reducing sperm counts. An industrial agricultural revolution has created a technology-dependent global food system, but it has also created serious long-run vulnerabilities, especially in its dependence on stable climates, crop monocultures and industrially produced chemical inputs. In effect, farming is a principal source of global toxification and soil degradation.
Without significant pressure from the public demanding action, Mason argues there could little chance of changing course fast enough to forestall disaster. The ‘free’ market is driving the impending disaster and blind faith in corporate-backed technology will not save us. Indeed, such faith in this technology is actually killing us.
Since the late 1990s, US scientists have written in increasingly desperate tones regarding an unprecedented number of fungal and fungal-like diseases, which have recently caused some of the most severe die-offs and extinctions ever witnessed in wild species and which are jeopardizing food security. Only one paper dared to mention pesticides as being a primary cause, however.
Mason cites a good deal of evidence to show how the widespread use on agricultural crops of the systemic neonicotinoid insecticides and the herbicide glyphosate, both of which cause immune suppression, make species vulnerable to emerging infectious pathogens, driving large-scale wildlife extinctions, including essential pollinators.
Providing evidence to show how human disease patterns correlate remarkably well with the rate of glyphosate usage on corn, soy and wheat crops, which has increased due to ‘Roundup Ready’ crops, Mason goes on to present more sources to show how our over-reliance on chemicals in agriculture is causing irreparable harm to all beings on this planet. Most of these chemicals are known to cause illness, and they have likely been causing illnesses for many years. But until recently, the herbicides have never been sprayed directly on food crops and never in this massive quantity.
The depopulation agenda
Mason discusses how agriculture and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) fit into a wider agenda for depopulating the planet. She notes that on the initiative of Gates, in May 2009 some of the richest people in the US met at the home of Nurse, a British Nobel prize-winning biochemist and President (2003–10) of Rockefeller University in Manhattan, to discuss ways of tackling a ‘disastrous’ environmental, social and industrial threat of overpopulation. The meeting was hosted by David Rockefeller Jr. These same individuals have met several times since to develop a strategy in which population growth would be tackled.
The Rockefeller Foundation (RF) was involved in extensive financing of eugenics research by the National Socialists (Nazis) during and after World War and was in league with some of the US’s most respected scientists from such prestigious universities as Stanford, Yale, Harvard and Princeton. The explicit aim of the eugenics lobby funded by wealthy élite families, such as Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harriman and others since the 1920s, has embodied what they termed ‘negative eugenics’, the systematic killing off of ‘undesired bloodlines’.
RF funded the earliest research on GMOs, which Mason regards as part of the depopulation agenda (of course, apart from the adverse health impacts of GMOs, Monsanto owns the ‘epicyte gene’ which causes sterility in males). The RF funded the earliest research on GMOs in the 1940s and effectively founded the science of molecular biology.
Mason cites Steven Druker to show the fraud behind GMOs and how governments and leading scientific institutions have systematically misrepresented the facts about GMOs and the scientific research that casts doubt on their safety. Druker has shown that GMOs can have severe health impacts, which have been covered up.
The Royal Society is the preeminent scientific body within the UK that advises the government. It has misrepresented the facts about GMOs and has engaged in various highly dubious and deceptive tactics to promote the technology.
Druker wrote an open letter to RS as it has an obligation to the British public to provide a public response and ‘put the record straight’ on GMOs. Although Sir Paul Nurse’s presidency of Rockefeller University terminated in 2010, after he assumed the Royal Society presidency, Mason notes that Nurse is said to have maintained a laboratory on the Rockefeller campus and has an ongoing relationship with the university.
She asks: is that why Sir Paul was unable (or unwilling) even to discuss GMOs with Steven Druker? Was he sent to London by the Rockefeller Foundation to support the UK Government in their attempt to bring in GM crops? The UK Government and the GM industry have after all been shown to be working together to promote GM crops and foods, undermine consumer choice and ignore environmental harm.
Mason then goes on to discuss the impact of glyphosate residues (herbicide-tolerant GM crops are designed to work with glyphosate), which are found in the organs of animals, human urine and human breast milk as well as in the air and rivers. She documents its widespread use and contamination of soil and water and notes that the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer’s assessment of glyphosate being a 2A carcinogen (probably carcinogenic in humans) is unwelcome news for the agrochemical industry. She also notes that Roundup usage has led to a depletion of biodiversity and that loss of biodiversity is also correlated with neonicotinoids. However, despite the evidence, the blatant disregard concerning the use of these substances by regulatory agencies around the world is apparent.
To provide some insight into the impact on health of the chemical-intensive model of agriculture, Mason shows that in the US increases in Alzheimer’s disease, obesity, breast cancer, oesophageal cancer, congenital anomalies and a growing burden of disability, particularly from mental disorders are all acknowledged.
She claims that plans are under way to depopulate the planet’s seven million plus people to a more manageable level of between 500–2000 million by a combination of means, including the poisoning and contamination of the planet’s food and water supplies via chemical-intensive industrialised agriculture. Mason also notes that health-damaging GMOs are being made available to the masses (under the guise of ‘feeding the poor’), while elites are more prone to eat organic food.
We may be gone before planned depopulation takes hold
Although Mason cites evidence to show that a section of the US elite has a depopulation agenda, given the amount of poisons being pumped into the environment and into humans, the thrust of her argument is that we could all be extinct before this comes to fruition – both rich and poor alike.
In concluding, she states that the global pesticides industry has been allowed to dominate the regulatory agencies and have created chemicals of mass destruction that can no longer be controlled. She has some faith in systems biology coming to the fore and being able to understand the complexity of the whole organism as a system, rather than just studying its parts in a reductionist manner. But Mason believes that ultimately the public must place pressure on governments and hold agribusiness to account.
However, that in itself may not be enough.
It is correct to highlight the poisonous impacts of the Rockefeller-sponsored petrochemical ‘green revolution’. It has uprooted indigenous/traditional agriculture and local economies and has recast them in a model that suits global agribusiness. It is poisoning life and the environment, threatening food security across the globe and is unsustainable. The ‘green revolution’ was ultimately a tool of US foreign policy that has been used in conjunction with various institutions like the IMF, World Bank and World Trade Organisation. GMOs represent more of the same.
In this respect, Mason follows the line of argument in William F Engdahl’s book ‘Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation’, which locates the GM issue and the ‘green revolution’ firmly within the context of empire. Engdahl also sees the Rockefeller-Gates hand behind the great GMO project to a sinister eugenicist strategy of depopulation.
Mason’s concerns about depopulation therefore should not be dismissed, particularly given the record of the likes of the Gates and Rockefeller clans, the various covert sterility programmes that have been instituted by the US over the decades and the way agriculture has and continues to be used as a geopolitical tool to further the agendas of rich interests in the US.
To understand the processes that have led to modern farming and the role of entities like Monsanto, we must appreciate the geopolitics of food and agriculture, which benefits an increasingly integrated global cartel of finance, oil, military and agribusiness concerns. This cartel seeks to gain from war, debt bondage and the control of resources, regardless of any notions relating to food security, good health and nutrition, biodiversity, food democracy, etc.
Food and trade policy analyst Devinder Sharma notes the impacts in India:
“India is on fast track to bring agriculture under corporate control… Amending the existing laws on land acquisition, water resources, seed, fertilizer, pesticides and food processing, the government is in overdrive to usher in contract farming and encourage organized retail. This is exactly as per the advice of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund as well as the international financial institutes.”
In Punjab, India, pesticides have turned the state into a ‘cancer epicentre‘. Moreover, Indian soils are being depleted as a result of the application of ‘green revolution’ ideology and chemical inputs. India is losing 5,334 million tonnes of soil every year due to soil erosion because of the indiscreet and excessive use of fertilisers, insecticides and pesticides. The Indian Council of Agricultural Research reports that soil is become deficient in nutrients and fertility.
And now, there is an attempt to push GM food crops into India in a secretive, non-transparent manner that smacks of regulatory delinquency underpinned by corrupt practices, which suggests officials are working hand in glove with US agribusiness.
As smallholders the world over are being driven from their land and the GMO/chemical-industrial farming model takes over, the problems continue to mount.
The environment, the quality of our food and our health are being sacrificed on the altar of corporate profit and a type of looting based on something we can loosely regard as ‘capitalism’. The solution involves a shift to organic farming and investment in and reaffirmation of indigenous models of agriculture. But ultimately it entails what Daniel Maingi of Growth Partners for Africa says what we must do: “… take capitalism and business out of farming.”
It must also entail, according to Maingi, investing in “… indigenous knowledge and agroecology, education and infrastructure and stand(ing) in solidarity with the food sovereignty movement.”
In other words, both farmers and consumers must organise to challenge governments, corrupt regulatory bodies and big agribusiness at every available opportunity. If we don’t do this, what Mason outlines may come to pass.
New Eastern Outlook
by Konrad Stachnio
The next step of the change from the current European Union to what could be called a European Police State might be the infectious diseases which are coming to us from Asia and Africa. It’s not just about long-extinct epidemics such as the plague, cholera, diphtheria, tuberculosis, smallpox, polio, hepatitis, scabies etc. It’s also about endemic and relatively new diseases, such as Ebola, SARS and MERS. Germany is dealing with this threat in the same matter-of-fact way as they do with the so-called refugee problem, by having local authorities forcing students to clean garbage and waste left behind by migrants. In this context, the threat of mass outbreaks can lead to the fact that the European Police State may soon come up with the idea that, for “our own good”, all EU members must be forcibly vaccinated – taking, for example, into consideration the fact that recently, in a refugee camp in Belgium, a person was found to be sick with tuberculosis.
In addition to the emerging disease in Europe, with it also comes an increase in criminal activities by the so-called ‘immigrants’, something governments and the corporate media, of course, deliberately do not inform us about. Immigrants create their own so-called ‘parallel societies’, living their separate lives and not assimilating into the countries they find themselves in. Those ‘parallel societies’ are now an incubator for emerging and increasingly well organised criminal groups. Currently, in countries besieged by refugees, rape, sexual harassment and physical attacks on houses, robberies, burglaries, drug trafficking and street robberies are a daily occurrence. As reported by the German Bild, twelve Arab clans have control over the criminal world of Berlin. The authors say that the clans that buy and sell drugs, rob banks and break into houses. They also introduced a “parallel justice” system, resolving conflicts with the help of mediators from other crime families.
If this trend is not stopped, these so-called refugees will become one of the most organized crime groups in Europe. Firstly, because they are treated on preferential terms in relation to the indigenous inhabitants of the communities they live in. Secondly, because even after arrest they are often immediately released. Thirdly, German police is becoming less and less effective, because of the number of refugees.
In a confidential report, “leaked” to Die Welt, it was revealed that the Hamburg police force has virtually capitulated to the teenage migrants, who are more numerous than the officers and whose actions are just too much to deal with. Franz Solms-Laubach, the author of the book “Das Ende der Sicherheit: Warum die Polizei uns nicht mehr schützen kann” (“The End of Security: Why the police are no longer able to protect us”), blames the German legislators for budget cuts and reductions of jobs, which have led to a situation in which the police are simply unable to do their job.
Underfunded and with deteriorating morale, the German police force certainly cannot be effective. Especially in a situation in which ‘parallel societies’ are increasingly expanding their spheres of influence. This happens due to the preferential terms offered by governments for refugees in relation to indigenous peoples. And that for many of them joining organized crime is the only way of making a living in another country, seeing as they do not know the language, have any qualifications or show any real desire to assimilate with the community in which they live.
In connection with the situation in Germany and other countries, “street games” are now joined so-called hooligans who naively think that, when faced with Islamist extremists trained in the Middle East, they have any sort of chance.
Sven Lau, a German Islamic campaigner, commented on this in a humorous fashion: “I am astonished that they were able to incite this mob against us we have never had any problems we have nothing to do with soccer and they have nothing to do with religion – Islam. But if they are looking for problems they can gladly have them. This isn’t a soccer game. If they get to close to us they need to know that this is a game of life and death.”
A Police Union
Russia’s win in Syria could lead to a situation in which ISIS shave off their beards and dress up as women to arrive to Europe. Here, in safe and comfortable conditions, and most importantly without Russian bombing over their heads, they will be able to continue their ‘war’. Except that this time mainly against European ‘infidel’ civilians and the number one enemy: Rome, and the Pope.
If it comes to this scenario, Putin will take the blame for smoking them out from Syria and bringing them to Europe, as well as for having the impudence to ‘annoy’ US ‘assets’ in the Middle East, that now with Putin to blame they will seek to have their revenge on all of us. This kind of propaganda leads to a fear of terrorists in Europe and the blaming for their potential attacks on Putin who ‘unduly’ ‘teased’ them. This is the kind of narration, through the example of CNN, we are dealing now.
“We cannot let them (the Islamic terrorists) return to their homes and use their Syrian experience there,” Putin said at the meeting of Heads of Member States of the Community of Independent States.
However Europe, flooding itself with untested masses of refugees is using quite the opposite tactic. However this time, Putin cannot clean up after everybody.
The so-called crisis of refugees, as well as setting people in Europe against each other as supporters and opponents, introducing destabilization by the threat of terrorism from ISIS and the threat of mass pandemic, also introduces some new ‘pro-democracy’ solutions:
The new Paris proposal, which is to be named “smart borders”, involves fingerprinting and facial scanning of all citizens of EU member states. The French want to use the migration crisis and the related threat of terrorism as an excuse to build a database, which will include biometric data of every citizen of the EU.
Bremen authorities allowed the temporary confiscation of vacant properties, even against the wishes of the owners, in the absence of other accommodation sites for immigrants. And those ran out some time ago. According to the law, unused buildings and land plots with an area exceeding 300 square meters can be taken over by the authorities. The owners of the confiscated property is entitled to compensation. Because it is not limited facilities for farm buildings, theoretically, it could also apply to private housing.
As we can see on the side prisonplanet.com “Those found guilty of “refugee baiting” remarks will be hit with fines up to €5000 euros or 120 days in jail. The program will be overseen by Network Against Nazis (Netz gegen Nazis), a group led by left-wing activist Anetta Kahane.
As we previously reported, Kahane worked as a Stasi informant under the codename “Victoria” from 1974-1982. The Stasi’s role was to spy on the population of East Germany and to use its vast network of informants to hunt down political dissidents.”
In Poland, for example, the Stefan Batory Foundation, founded by the famous Jewish speculator, George Soros, gained as much as 150 million zlotys for a program which will be one of the pillars of the fight against homophobia, anti-Semitism, xenophobia and all forms of discrimination. Criticism of the Islamic invasion may soon be strictly prohibited, as it shall be construed as ‘hate speech’.
This leads to a situation in which you might be reported to the police for being critical of Islam, or the so-called refugee issue, when making entries on Facebook or commenting under online articles, through the monitoring of these entries by different ‘pro-democracy foundations’.
An example of this is what recently happened to the Polish emeritus Professor Boguslaw Wolniewicz. After the publication of his recordings on You Tube, in which he says that one must “sink the boat with so-called immigrants, and not save it! “, the police paid him a visit after they made him a denunciation of the prosecution.
All of these forms of support for so-called refugees are happening at the moment of the underfunding of the German police, jobs cuts, declining morale and social authority as well as increasing inefficiency. Added to this, it is also a matter of growing of silence by the mainstream media and governments of serious crimes committed by the so-called refugees in Europe. An example is the outrage caused by the lack of reaction from the Swedish government to the murder of a mother and her son; Caroli and Emil Herlin in swedish IKEA. As a result, on the 15th of September on Sergels Torg, the main market in Stockholm, hundreds of protesters demanded the resignation of the government.
However perhaps Germany will be able to reverse this trend. Recently, the German Bild published information that Germany has to take responsibility for deporting immigrants by military aircraft as well as introduce limits for intake of refugees.
At the end of having to prove that they are no longer Nazis, the Israeli Prime Minister Banjamin Nataniahu released them from this by saying that Hitler did not want the genocide of the Jews until he met with the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Muhammad Amin al-Husanim.
This is judging by comments made by the German government spokesman Steffen Seibert.
‘I see no reason we changed our view of the story in any way. We know that the responsibility for a crime against humanity is a German and our very great extent “.
So we see that Germany very much cherishes its memory of the role they played in history. As a consequence, their abandonment of the process of ‘repenting’ for their Nazi past can now go a little more laboriously.
Konrad Stachnio is an independent Poland based journalist, he hosted a number of radio and TV programs for the Polish edition of Prison Planet, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.
by Bernie Suarez
In 2014 I wrote about how the new world order plans sustained quite a few noticeable and uncomfortable setbacks, enough for anyone paying attention to take notice and wonder if 2015 would be worse for the global elite. Well it’s not quite the end of 2015 (as of the time of this article) and already there are signs all around us that the Western cabal’s new world order plans could be slowly dying.
Some people would consider this overly optimistic. My response to that is to point out that the journey to human freedom versus enslavement is a dynamic process with ups and downs. Those pushing for a one world government are fighting to prevent awakening and true revolution. They’re fighting to keep people unaware, confused and uninformed about significant domestic and global events. Yes, I agree at times it seems like things are getting worse. But I also notice that when things turn for the worse, things soon afterward often turn for the better. The net result is more than ever people are not believing mainstream media news. One minute we see that the “Strong Cities Network” new world order plans are rolling forward, the next minute we see how U.S. lies about arming terrorist in Syria are being exposed globally. Again, the net result is that in this dynamic process things are trending toward mass awakening and solutions. I interpret this as a possible sign that we are very likely witnessing the slow eventual death of the new world order whose existence is becoming less and less probable as more and more people wake up to the globalist plans.
There is change in the air. Orders and paradigms change all the time. Even the very phrase “new world order” is fading away as the globalist opt for terms like “Agenda 2030” whose participation is voluntary leaving it vulnerable to an awakened public. But the full prospects of an Orwellian mechanized brainwashed obedient society that the eugenic controllers dream about seems to be off course and off schedule. I believe there is growing evidence for several years in a row now that the plans of the new world order are dying. This death is the primary reason for the attacks on the Internet. Truth seekers should focus on ways to protect the Internet and free speech as an open Internet I believe all but ensures the defeat of the new world order.
What do you think? Is the new world order dying or not? Here are some examples of stories and narratives that have not exactly helped the new world order plans. These examples are in no particular order as they are all important signs of this slow dying process.
1. Russia, Putin dismantle ISIS psyop with direct bombing campaign and new accord with partner nations.
We’ve all watched as Russian air strikes have dealt a blow to CIA’s ISIS. Even more striking has been the U.S.’s lack of appreciation for Russian destruction of ISIS targets. And how can pro-“rebel”-ISIS terror partners McCain, Kerry, Obama and company be happy that their proxy terror army is being destroyed along with the U.S. military’s “7 countries in 5 years” war plan for the Middle East? Obviously this is bad news for McCain, Kerry and company. Even Obama’s “ISIS Czar” was forced to step down to avoid embarrassment or worse, being linked to arming and funding a known terror group. And it didn’t help that a few months back Russian hackers exposed the U.S. Intelligence filming one of the fake ISIS beheading videos green screen and all.
For that reason we’ve witnessed an enormous amount of daily anti-Syria, anti-Assad, anti-Russia propaganda flowing from Washington. All of this pro-war propaganda only exposes the failing and dying new world order and their PNAC plans. The tides are turning and few events have marked what could be a Middle East political turning point more than Russia’s decision to defend Syria from the West’s ISIS proxy terror group.
2. TV reporter “live” shooting false flag falls completely apart; then disappears from news prompting second seemingly staged shooting one month later.
What might arguably be the sloppiest crisis actor shooting in recent history, Sandy Hook notwithstanding, the Virginia TV reporter shooting may have set the bar at a new high in terms of bad actors, bad camera work, improbabilities, coincidences and staged calls for gun control. The death blow to this horrifically failed false flag was seeing not one but two distinct takes of the first shot. At this point the false flag attempt died for good prompting permanent removal from mainstream media’s short term memory bank. The last thing the establishment wanted was to have people sharing awareness of the failed false flag so for that reason they put together the Oregon school shooting about a month later. It was the perfect tool for helping everyone forget the supposed live TV shooting. To highlight a great example of this engineered forgetfulness take note that in December of 2014 I’ve pointed out in the past how the mainstream media deliberately ignored the anniversary of the Sandy Hook supposed massacre. Imagine the mainstream media overlooking the anniversary of the supposed largest childhood massacre in U.S. history. This is a good thing to look out for this coming December to see if they do it again or they roll out a brand new witness “I shot Bin Laden” style.
When crisis actor shootings are laid to rest as quickly as the Virginia TV Reporter shooting episode that is a potential sign that the new world order plans may be in trouble. The controllers have to be nervous about the impact of alternative media and the Internet and they seem to have received the message loud and clear. They know that their staged presentations have to be perfect and are subject to intense scrutiny by those awakened. People are catching on to the unchanging script manifesto and all. Again just another sign of a potentially dying plan.
3. 2016 Presidential candidates continually taking jabs at globalist plans … starting to sound like “conspiracy” theorists.
Though the election process is still corrupt and controlled by dirty bought off politicians, it’s always interesting to hear sound bites of truth come out of presidential candidates and the debates with increased frequency. Yes, the debates are nothing but a sideshow to begin with, and yes the system is reeking with corruption. But as the new world order dies slowly we continue to hear small comments by certain candidates poking at the controllers, making controversial comments to make people think. Donald Trump naturally comes to mind in this context. We have a very long way to go in this race but I’m quietly wondering every day what “controversial” comments (9/11, vaccines, GMO etc) will be made next to catch the establishment off guard?
4. Bizarre desperate and futile attempt to sell repackaged new world order plans using the Pope falls mostly on deaf and inattentive ears.
So much production went into the Pope visit to America. People in awe of the Pope but deep down not knowing why. An ordinary old man representing stale ideologies of the distant past, trying hard to directly touch on political issues without anyone noticing that he was talking about global political issues which happen to be synonymous with the new world order plans. A reminder to us all that some people still believe whatever a single man blindly tells them. Though the Pope was applauded everywhere he went and all of his ideas went unchallenged as usual, there is reason to believe the whole Pope show in America in September of 2015 was another subtle sign that the new world order could be dying. We’ll see how many freedom loving, educated and informed Americans fall for “sustainable” global living psyop enforced by the U.N. I don’t expect too many will go for this. I truly believe Pope followers applauded the Pope because he is the Pope not because they truly comprehended the magnitude of his tyrannical message. I also believe many people heard his global order message and simply didn’t take him seriously. The real question thus is, does anyone actually listen to the Pope?
5. U.S. geopolitical strategies and provocations are now regularly failing.
The provocations of old (Pearl Harbor, Gulf of Tonkin, WMD, 9/11) and new (MH-17, Syrian chemical weapons, North Korean “hacking” SONY) are exposed to the world. These provocations are the false flag lies and important pre-war accusation pinned on enemies of countries the U.S. wanted to destroy. These events are cemented into U.S. history and today we are now seeing provocation attempts badly failing. We spoke above about the ISIS plans now blown open by Russia. The thing Russia has done is to sabotage the Pentagon’s “7 countries in 5 years” Middle East plans admitted by General Wesley Clark years after the invasion and destruction of Iraq had begun. The atrocious failures of the U.S. provocations were evident the last few years with the “chemical weapons” claim against Assad and his country of Syria. When U.S. Intelligence strategies are no longer working it could be a small subtle if not obvious sign that the new world order is finally dying.
6. United Nations keeps trying to outline new rules for new world order, no one takes them seriously.
Like the Pope, the United Nations has been very busy declaring things that should be, could be and will be, but is anyone outside of the puppet politicians really paying attention? Is anyone prepared to give up their sovereignty and personal interest to the will of the United Nations for any reason? With most Americans not believing in the anthropogenic global warming Al Gore CO2 lies is there any chance people will blindly accept U.N. “sustainable” regulations while the control system pretends climate changing geoengineering is not happening? These are the fundamental questions everyone should ask before thinking that U.N.’s declaration of a need for “sustainable” living is gospel.
7. “Conspiracy theories” now commonly being adopted as reality in some churches and other important sectors of life.
Mass resistance to government corruption is at all-time high. The resistance is coming from many directions. Many people are sorting out in their minds how to categorize this rising global tyrannical force. Some Christians are trying to relate this to scripture and prophesies as the link above shows. As truth seekers we’ll take it. Whatever it takes for people to realize what is happening. Many of the “progressive” moves carried out by the Obama administration have quietly backfired on the globalists as people make the connection between today’s social engineering, education system agenda and the occult which the globalist are all into. Another example is people in the health care industry are waking up to the corruption in the medical industrial complex as they observe attempted forced vaccination and heavily funded campaigns to keep people in the dark about the truth behind GMO foods, all the while the cancer-industrial complex make billions. It appears many people from all the sectors of life are now waking up and seeing the truth about what is happening.
8. Attempted secrecy from political leaders and agencies now backfires in ways it never did before.
Every day we’re hearing about emails (e.g. Hillary, IRS scandal, IPCC) being exposed to the world showing political corruption and planned lies being told to cover up crimes. These revelations in the form of emails, documents, recordings, videos, whistleblower statements and more are all helping remove presidential candidates and forcing resignations from political positions. I believe the attempted secrecy by politicians is now failing because of the dying new world order which clearly underestimated the impact of the Internet. Humanity is only getting better every day. I hope and expect in the near future to see improved and comprehensive ‘anti-corruption’ applications that will tell the world when a politician is lying and committing a crime. Here’s a thought. Can future A.I. software be programmed to search and expose government corruption? What if A.I. were used against tyranny and top-down control or to expose crisis actor shootings? This question will be answered in due time but for now I see a slow but undeniable pattern shifting in the direction of political accountability.
9. The mainstream media primary portal of information is slowly dying.
We’ve heard it many times. Mainstream media ratings are at an all-time low. Every day fewer and fewer people are getting their news from mainstream media. This is a definite problem for the new world order which relies on the mainstream media cooperative mouthpiece to spread their propaganda, lies and deceit. The biggest problem mainstream media faces is us. Yes, alternative new media is rising more than ever because we are covering the whole story not just an agenda driven cookie-cuttter version of the event. The success of true alternative media is that it satisfies the natural human quest for truth by providing information deliberately left out by mainstream media. Anyone can tell a lie and mainstream media will push that lie but it is much harder to stop someone else from revealing the parts you purposely omitted. You can only name-call someone “conspiracy theorist” so many times before the phrase loses its meaning as we have seen over the years. So as long as mainstream media stays on script and filters their monopoly news through CIA these problems of survival and decreasing ratings will continue. Will mainstream media eventually go completely broke and be forced to go away once and for all? I foresee in the future a failed attempt at perhaps a CIA-run single mega network. This single “ministry of truth” network will launch failed attacks on alternative media and be exposed as mainstream media is exposed today. For this reason independent and alternative media must keep moving forward and be ready to deliver the finishing blow to an already dying government information system.
10. Local police pull together, take jab at Big Pharma corruption and greed.
Positive police stories are extremely rare today so this one caught my attention. Police in Gloucester, Massachusetts pulled together to expose big pharmaceutical companies contributing to the pain killer drug addiction in their town. This problem is part of the corrupt medical industrial complex which is another part of the new world order. The word is out. People everywhere have had enough of large pharmaceutical companies pushing their dangerous drugs on humanity and killing people with full immunity. It’s nice to see something like this happen to hold these criminal companies accountable. Another example of a slowly dying corrupt system.
11. U.S. blows up hospital in Afghanistan – Doctors and International community call for war crimes charges before it can be blamed on terrorists.
This was not an expected headline in the past. Usually U.S. war crimes are hidden or the mainstream media pretends it’s not happening. As usual they (the mainstream media) tried to downplay this story again. They even timed the latest suspected crisis actor mass shooting in Oregon with this event so on the day the U.S. military commits an atrocious war crime against humanity (October 3, 2015) the mainstream media was giving 24/7 coverage to the suspicious crisis actor shooting at Umpqua College which took place around 48 hours prior. Despite this usual attempt to downplay the news of the war crime, thanks to the many other independent, international and alternative news networks the word of the incident got out quickly and is now common knowledge to the international community. Everyone who cares about humanity should be hoping for justice to be served for those murdered while in the hospital sick or taking care of the sick. The severity of this war crime cannot be understated and the fact that the international community is calling for war crime charges puts another dent in the plans of the new world order. Humanity is well aware of who the terrorists are. The walls are closing in and this war crime just made those walls crumble a little quicker.
12. Despite ongoing false flag “mass shootings”, control system not able to pass gun laws legislation.
We all observed as another suspected crisis actor shooting took place on October 1, 2015 and another a month prior to that. In the latest shooting incident notice the entire narrative from A to Z was provided by “witnesses.” As usual, no actual pictures of the dead bodies or blood, no images of emergency vehicles rushing to the scene, not one cell phone video emerged from the scene, no authenticated sound, no blood stains on the floor, spent bullet shells or any logically cohesive narrative that makes sense provided. We saw the usual “manifesto” and as usual the shooter ends up dead leaving no evidence for the public to chew on. The entire narrative as I said was provided by select witnesses. That’s the bad news for those who hate being intellectually insulted. The good news which is actually bad news for the globalists and the cooperating Obama administration is that no matter how much they want to disarm Americans, statistics prove over and over again that when Americans are allowed to be armed there are no shootings whatsoever. In other words MORE guns mean LESS mass shootings. But wait, we just said the shooting looked fake. So what do we do about this? Shouldn’t lying to the public be a crime? And shouldn’t we be trying to expose these shooting events. Yes we should by all means, but in the end the logic suggesting that more shootings should be a reason to disarm Americans is fundamentally flawed. For that reason all these false flag shootings are not working and though we may not succeed in awakening others to the false flag at least we can rest assured that there is evidence to show that their plans are all actually backfiring as Americans begin to realize that they cannot afford to not have a weapon. People are realizing that it takes just one armed responsible American to disable a potential shooter and this is much more effective than depending on a liberty destroying police state to provide perceived “safety.” People are realizing that no degree of “safety” is worth giving up your rights for.
As long as the globalists don’t see the logic in their way of thinking they will continue to use these shootings to push their agenda, but thankfully it appears that the flaw in their logic won’t allow them to gain any ground on this issue. This is yet another example of the failure of the new world order as they will never get their new world order without disarming everyone and disarming Americans it appears now will never happen.
13. Monsanto losses continue to mount, inching closer to collapse.
Another example of the dying new world order as I mentioned in part 1 of this article is the failures of Monsanto which is said to be inching closer and closer to collapse. Every day we hear a Monsanto story as their products are being linked to cancer by other countries, researchers and scientists. Monsanto cannot run or hide. Their name alone is synonymous to many people with evil, corruption, greed, intimidation, deception and much more. Face it, Monsanto has become a representation of what is wrong with humanity today. We never hear Monsanto mentioned in a positive light and there is a reason for that. They do nothing to help humanity. They are directly responsible for all those who get cancer and die as a result of eating years of Monsanto genetically modified foods like the mice did in the famous Seralini studies. That Monsanto is falling is another potential sign of the inevitable collapse of the control system it works for.
14. Police departments nationwide forced to give back grenade launchers, bayonets and tanks.
Another story we don’t see too often. Police are now being forced to give back military gear they probably got through the federal 1033 program which allowed the local police to get combat gear to begin with. There is some irony given that the federal government is responsible for the issuing out of this military gear and is also the one asking for it back nationwide. Does the federal government simply want the gear so that they can give it to someone else? Is this part of another nefarious plan? Either way, whenever you take big guns away from the local police that’s another possible sign that the new world order may be slowly dying.
15. Climate alarmist caught in largest scandal in U.S. history.
This, in the words of former Virginia State climate scientist Pat Michaels after it was reported that 20 climate alarmists wrote a letter to Obama urging him to use RICO laws to imprison global warming deniers or climate “skeptics.” On top of this the plan is now backfiring as chief climate alarmist ‘Anne Shukla’ is now reportedly facing House investigation for numerous other issues including climate change mega funding without any accountability. The globalist need their global warming lies and climate change “sustainable” agenda without which they’ll never get their Agenda 2030 new world order plans. Of course they will never look to expose geoengineering which is destroying the planet because stopping geoengineering and arresting and imprisoning or executing pilots cooperating with global spraying programs against humanity and the planet doesn’t give them the global carbon tax and control over humanity they need.
16. Texas governor orders federal BLM agents to get out of Texas!
Governor Greg Abbott, in response to the ongoing battles between Texas land owners and the federal government’s Bureau of Land Management, wrote “The BLM should demonstrate that the federal government still respects private property rights and end this unconscionable land grab.” Abbott also wrote in April of 2014 “I am about ready to go to the Red River and raise a ‘Come and Take It’ flag to tell the feds to stay out of Texas.” also stating “Texas will not wait any longer” in response to the BLM not answering the questions it’s been asked regarding illegal land grabs. The tone of this inquiry sounds intense. Clearly the state of Texas has had enough of federal government thugs thinking they have power over the state and private land owners and this seemingly soft threat is a reminder that federal government is subordinate to the state according the U.S. Constitution. Let this be a reminder to all that if we are going to allow government to exist then it can only exist in a bottom-up manner where federal government has the least amount of power. Anything else is tyranny.
Let this also be a reminder to all that it is up to us to do the things necessary to make sure that power flows from the lowest level upward. Top-down power must be held in check. Empower your town to do what is in the best interest of the people not large corporations, federal government or international bodies who like to push their regulations in the form of “initiatives”. As long as states continue to put the federal government in place and as long as people stand up for themselves at the lowest levels the new world order plans will never succeed because it is dependent on people not realizing their own sovereignty, influence and power at the lowest levels.
This may sound simple but I’ll say it again. The simple realization of self ownership, if enough people realize this is all that is needed to ensure the failure of the new world order. We’ve covered many different angles here and there are many more that could have been listed. It’s important to realize that the controllers never stop trying so rest assured that they are licking their wounds and looking for new techniques to implement in order to continue their agendas. The intention of this article is not to spread false hope but to spread motivation and encouragement to all to continue doing what you are doing to help fight for humanity and to inspire you to do more. The battle is ongoing and we can’t ever assume the battle is over all already won. We are nowhere near that point, however the victories are all around us. Victories and accomplishments we could not have imagined just a few years ago.
Bernie is a revolutionary writer with a background in medicine, psychology, and information technology. He has written numerous articles over the years about freedom, government corruption and conspiracies, and solutions. A former host of the 9/11 Freefall radio show, Bernie is also the creator of the Truth and Art TV project where he shares articles and videos about issues that raise our consciousness and offer solutions to our current problems. His efforts are designed to encourage others to joyfully stand for truth, to expose government tactics of propaganda, fear and deception, and to address the psychology of dealing with the rising new world order. He is also a former U.S. Marine who believes it is our duty to stand for and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. A peace activist, he believes information and awareness is the first step toward being free from enslavement from the globalist control system which now threatens humanity. He believes love conquers all fear and it is up to each and every one of us to manifest the solutions and the change that you want to see in this world, because doing this is the very thing that will ensure victory and restoration of the human race from the rising global enslavement system, and will offer hope to future generations.
by Brandon Smith
People are desperate for leaders and heroes. This is an undeniable condition of human life and of human civilization. Some historians and social observers, however, seem to think it is enough to simply point out this condition and pretend as if they have made some grand declaration; as if they have come to the root of the problem of mankind. In their laziness, they have mistaken a symptom for the cause.
Why do people so often demand leaders and heroic figures? What drives the institutionalization of hierarchy, celebrity and geopolitical idolization? I believe this condition is caused by three factors – fear, ignorance, and apathy.
This is not to say that there are not people throughout history that are worth looking up to, or that looking up to a particular hero figure is wrong. Heroes and sometimes leaders can act as points of reference, helping us to aspire to greater personal accomplishment and extraordinary achievement. The problem is many historical figures labeled heroic are in fact monsters in masks paraded as saviors by history writers with agendas. Real heroes (in the past hundred years in particular) are most often unsung, and remain little known.
This is why the idolization of puppet leaders is so disturbing to those of us in the Liberty Movement. We witnessed the blind militancy of the so-called “right wing” in the support of George W. Bush after 9/11, only to be led into quagmire, economic despair, and a surveillance state based on numerous lies. We then had to witness the insane cult-like fervor of the so-called “left wing” as Barack Obama took office, only to continue and accelerate the same draconian policies of the Bush Administration while conjuring new methods for the division and destruction of American society and prosperity.
Yes, the Liberty Movement has examined every detail and is well versed in the horrors of the false Left/Right paradigm. Again, I’ll have to quote the ever useful elitist member of the Council on Foreign Relations and mentor to former president Bill Clinton, Carroll Quigley, on this particular issue, from his book ‘Tragedy And Hope’:
“…The argument of two parties should represent opposed ideas and policies, one perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinate and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can “throw the rascals out” at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. The policies that are vital and necessary for America are no longer subjects of significant disagreement, but are disputable only in details of procedure, priority, or method.”
What truly disturbs me is that our movement can be so awake and aware of the false left/right paradigm while remaining astonishingly naïve and short sighted when it comes to the false East/West paradigm. And once again, I have to attribute this naivety to a desperation for heroes caused by fear and apathy.
I have written on the reality that Eastern political interests are just as controlled by globalists as Western political interests for years. Readers can review the considerable amount of data and evidence I have collected on Russia and Vladimir Putin in particular and the ties between the East and international financiers and well known globalists in recent articles such as ‘Russia Is Dominated By Global Banks, Too‘, ‘False East/West Paradigm Hides The Rise Of Global Currency‘, and ‘The New World Order And The Rise Of The East‘.
In fact, I predicted almost every aspect of the current Syrian crisis based on the knowledge that the East versus West dynamic was purely an engineered conflict designed to diminish American power and economic influence through the use of planned chaos, and I did this years before events were ever triggered in the region.
I knew what was about to happen in Syria only because I understood one important fundamental – that there are no “sides” in any modern conflict, only proxies fighting on a global chessboard controlled by the same elitist interests. Syria represented a perfect catalyst for a planetary scale conflict triggered between East and West in way that could divert attention from internationalists. Modern war, whether through kinetics or economics, is almost always theater designed to distract and terrorize the masses, which are the true target of any conflagration.
We must set aside childish assumptions on war. Wars are not about resources. They are not about territory. They are not about the hegemony of any particular nation state. If you buy into such notions, you have been duped. No, war is about something much bigger. War first and foremost is a tool for the manipulation and molding of public psychology. As Edward Bernays, the father of modern propaganda said:
“The great enemy of any attempt to change men’s habits is inertia. Civilization is limited by inertia.”
War is meant to forcefully change the “inertia” of civilization, and thus, forcefully change the direction of civilization in a manner that benefits the engineers of the conflict.
One great threat to the mechanism of globalism and the elites behind it is the liberty movement, which is slowly but steadily growing in popularity and influence as America edges ever closer to economic and sociopolitical oblivion. As the U.S. is homogenized, harmonized, and brought down to third world status for the benefit of a one-world system, resistance continues to grow.
You see, one negative side-effect of the rush towards centralization and a single global power (often referred to by the elites as the “New World Order”) is that the harder the globalists push society toward their Utopian ideal, the more individuals (not controlled governments or political puppets) wake up to the threat. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. The Liberty Movement is the equalizing reaction to forced globalization.
In order for the elites to neutralize the threat we present, they must either destroy us or co-opt us. I believe the East/West paradigm is being used in part to attempt the co-option of liberty elements.
Despite the fact that many liberty analysts are beginning to understand the nature of the false East/West paradigm and the truth behind the rise of Russia, the predictable escalation in Syria is energizing a strange brand of Putin-worship once again. Liberty elements WANT to believe that Putin is somehow in opposition to globalization, that he is somehow morally superior to the Obama Administration, and that Russia is on the side of right in the fight against ISIS and the evil Western empire.
They want to believe this because they are afraid – they are afraid that they are alone in the fight against the NWO. They are afraid that they will have to commit to personal sacrifice and struggle against a vastly technologically superior opponent. They are afraid that they alone will have to take responsibility for America’s destiny and that no great leader on a white horse is coming to blaze the path ahead of them.
Because of this fear, they sometimes commit the crime of cognitive dissonance in order to protect their false belief in a heroic Putin. They will ignore the fact that Putin is a long time friend of Henry Kissinger, the most publicly vocal proponent of the “New World Order, and that Putin describes Kissinger as his “trusted foreign policy adviser”.
They will ignore the fact that Russia’s primary economic adviser is none other than the hitman of the international banking syndicate, Goldman Sachs, and that Goldman Sachs has been deeply involved in Russia’s economic affairs since at least 1992, just after the fall of the Soviet Union.
They will ignore the fact that Putin and Russia have allied closely with the IMF (an institution supposedly dominated by the U.S.). Putin and the IMF are so intertwined that it was Putin who demanded that the IMF take over the management of Ukraine’s finances after the regional crisis began, and, it was the IMF that blatantly supported Putin’s call for a change in Ukraine’s bond status from private to “official”. Russia also demanded that Ukraine’s debts be repaid in Special Drawing Rights, the global currency basket which the IMF plans to use to replace the U.S. dollar as the world reserve mechanism.
They will also surely ignore the fact that Putin and the Kremlin have on multiple occasion called for the IMF to take over global management of the worlds financial systems through the implementation of the SDR as the new world reserve currency.
And of course, the fact that Russia is a member of the Bank for International Settlements and the BIS is the policy dictator of ALL central banking (do I really need to quote Carroll Quigley on the BIS yet again?) does not bode well for the affiliations and intentions of Russia as a whole, yet we are still bombarded in the liberty movement with platitudes on how Putin is “sticking it to the bankers”. No, I’m afraid not. According to the evidence, Putin is just like Obama: Yet another whore for the internationalists. Post all the pictures you want of the guy holding an uzi or finishing a judo throw, but his public persona does not fit reality.
The mainstream media in the U.S. has for the most part run on the narrative that Putin is the next Stalin, and if you are going to perpetuate a false East/West paradigm this makes perfect sense. But there is also a separate narrative being presented to the liberty movement and the rest of the world.
The talking points coming out of outlets like RT (Russia Today), a media machine controlled by the Russian government, has for the past few years stolen brilliant observations by American liberty proponents and repackaged them as video fluff. Most of these observations are negative in their view of U.S. government policy as well as central banking dictatorship, and they are also entirely correct. The problem is, RT does not apply the same standards of journalistic skepticism to the Russian government or its ties to the central banking cabal.
Time Magazine publishes pro-Putin articles naming him “man of the year” in every other nation where they have distribution, but removes these stories and covers when publishing in America.
The general American public is being sold on the idea that Putin is a calculating danger to global stability and that Western governments must become more aggressive to counter the threat. The rest of the world and the liberty movement are being sold on the image of a benevolent Putin and a Russia standing firm against the corrupt war machine of the West, but this image simply is not real.
The danger for the liberty movement in the near future is considerable. Our blind support of the false East/West paradigm makes us vulnerable to easy co-option, for if we as a movement are tricked into closely affiliating with Russia then we lose our identity as a force for American independence and become nothing more than an “Eastern created” faux revolution. Think it can’t happen? Mainstream media outlets are ALREADY building the narrative. The Atlantic was the first, with an article directly connecting “right wing” movements and “conspiracy theorists” in the U.S. with Russian influence and propaganda.
As the false East/West confrontation grows, the real purpose of such a crisis will become apparent. ISIS agents conveniently shipped out of Syria among millions of “refugees” before Russian forces finally decided to strike will wreak havoc in Western nations. Economic chaos will become prevalent. The U.S. will lose the dollar’s petro-status as the East subsumes Eurasia. Fear of another world war will haunt public perception. The ever uneducated and terrified mass majority will become far less tolerant of intelligent dissent. And, the Fabian Socialists infesting global institutions will suggest a clever solution to the problem they created – the dissolution of all sovereign nations and the complete centralization of governance into the hands of a select few to save humanity from such destructive divisions.
If you understand that a primary goal of globalists is to fully remove constitutional protections in America and assert a totalitarian framework, then you have to admit that a conflict with Russia is an excellent opportunity for them. War fever makes men delirious and malleable, and outside threats make internal despotism more tolerable.
In the meantime, if the liberty movement refuses to treat Russia with the same x-ray vision it has used against western governments (a Russia clearly working with international financiers and globalist institutions) then we make it far easier for the elitist propaganda machine to paint us as Eastern backed traitors rather than freedom fighters down the road, thus crushing our chances at garnering increased support from the public and awakening new voices.
Mark my words, in the end we will not only be forced to rebel against centralization under our own criminal government; we will also have to rebel against criminal puppet governments everywhere. I have no doubt that when we see the ranks of the globalist enemy, there will be Russian faces standing right alongside Western oligarchs. Maybe then people will finally admit that the East/West crisis was a carefully crafted hoax all along.
by Brandon Smith
“Actually, as Winston well knew, it was only four years since Oceania had been at war with Eastasia and in alliance with Eurasia. But that was merely a piece of furtive knowledge, which he happened to possess because his memory was not satisfactorily under control. Officially the change of partners had never happened. Oceania was at war with Eurasia: therefore Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia. The enemy of the moment always represented absolute evil, and it followed that any past or future agreement with him was impossible…” – George Orwell, 1984
Nations, cultures and populations are best controlled through the use of false paradigms. This is a historically proven tactic exploited for centuries by oligarchs around the world. Under the Hegelian dialectic (the very foundation of the Marxist and collectivist ideology), one could summarize the trap of false paradigms as follows:
If (A) my idea of freedom conflicts with (B) your idea of freedom, then (C) neither of us can be free until everyone agrees to be a slave.
In other words: problem, reaction, solution. Two sides are pitted against each other in an engineered contest. Each side is led to believe that its position is the good and right position. Neither side questions the legitimacy of the conflict, because each side fears this will lead to ideological weakness and disunity.
The two sides go to war, sometimes economically, sometimes militarily. Both governments demand that individuals relinquish freedom, independence and self-reliance, a sacrifice that “must be made” so that victory can be achieved. In the end, neither nation nor society has truly won. The only winners are the oligarchs, who sing words of loyalty to their respective camps, while acting in league from the very beginning. The oligarchs, who never intended to target each other in the first place. Their target, their ONLY target, was the citizenry itself — the dumbfounded masses now mesmerized with shock, awe and terror.
The false paradigm method and the Hegelian dialectic are in full force today. Only a few years ago, Russia, China and the United States were considered close economic and political allies. Today, those alliances are being quickly scrapped in order to make room for conflict, a conflict useful only to a select international elite. As I have outlined in numerous articles, including Russia Is Dominated By Global Banks, Too and False East/West Paradigm Hides The Rise Of Global Currency, when one looks beyond all the theatrical rhetoric being thrown around between Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin, the ultimate reality is that the relationship of both governments to the global banking elite is the same.
During both of Obama’s Presidential terms, he has flooded his cabinet with current and former employees of Goldman Sachs, a longtime proving ground for elitist financiers with globalist aspirations.
And who is the primary economic adviser to Vladimir Putin and the Russian state? Why Goldman Sachs, of course!
U.S. and European elites have been calling for a centralization of economic power under the control of the International Monetary Fund, as a well as a new global currency.
Not surprisingly, Putin also wants a new global currency under the control of the IMF.
Obama is closely advised by globalists like Zbigniew Brzezinski, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and cofounder of the Trilateral Commission, who in his book Between Two Ages: America’s Role In The Technetronic Era states:
“The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty …[F]urther progress will require greater American sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position…”
“In the end, the political and economic systems can be harmonized in only one of two ways: by creating an international political regulatory system with the same reach as that of the economic world; or by shrinking the economic units to a size manageable by existing political structures, which is likely to lead to a new mercantilism, perhaps of regional units. A new Bretton Woods kind of global agreement is by far the preferable outcome…”
Both Kissinger and Brzezinski refer to this harmonized global economic and political structure as the “New World Order.” The fact that the political leaders of Russia and the United States are clearly being directed by such men should not be taken lightly.
China, too, has made demands for a restructuring of the global monetary system into a centralized currency basket under the dominance of the IMF.
China’s ties to the banking elite of London are well documented.
The call on both sides for a new monetary system and the end of the dollar as world reserve seems to greatly contradict the fantasy that the East and West are fundamentally at odds. The progression towards a world currency and/or economic governance also appears to be growing along with the consolidation of economic and military ties between Eastern nations. This would suggest that the rise of the East and the crippling of Western elements is actually advantageous to global bankers in the long term.
While disinformation agents and media shills have attempted to downplay any danger to the strength of America and the dollar, Eastern governments have been swiftly establishing alliances and decoupling from U.S. influence.
The historic 30-year Russia/China gas deal has, of course, been finalized. This deal is already eating up market space and influencing the way in which the energy trade traditionally behaves.
China and Russia have also expanded on their bilateral agreements made in 2010, which remove the dollar as the reserve currency in transactions between the two nations.
China’s thirst for gold continues, while the country is now building its own gold exchange to rival the U.S. Comex.
Russia has recently established what Putin calls the “Eurasian Economic Union,” a deal which includes Kazakhstan and Belarus, two countries that hold large, freshly discovered oil fields.
In response to the engineered conflict over Ukraine, as well as the “Asian-Pacific Pivot” by the U.S., China has openly called for a new security pact with Russia and Iran.
Let’s also not forget that China is set to surpass the U.S. as the world’s largest economy by 2016, according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
While the rise of the East is being painted in Western circles as a threat to U.S. and NATO dominance, the bigger picture is being hidden from view. Yes, indeed, the consolidation of the East is a considerable threat to the dollar and the U.S. economy — most importantly in the event that China refuses to accept dollars as payment on exports and debts. With the world’s largest exporter/importer refusing to take dollars as a reserve, most nations will inevitably follow their lead. The argument against this development is, of course, that there is no rational trigger for such a violent fiscal attack. I would remind skeptics that there was no rational trigger for the current strengthened relations between Russia and China until the Ukraine crisis. Is anyone really foolish enough to bet against another direct or indirect conflict between NATO and the East? And is anyone really ignorant enough to assume that said event would not be used as an excuse to cut the legs out from under the dollar completely?
The New World Order players have positioned the East and West for just such a scenario. Why? In my article Who Is The New Secret Buyer Of U.S. Debt?, I give evidence indicating that the Bank of International Settlements and the IMF are preparing the financial world for a new global monetary system, brought into existence by a second Bretton Woods conference. The debasement of the dollar and the rise of the East are NOT obstacles to this plan. Rather, they are required factors. There can be no truly global economic system without “harmonization”, the demise of the dollar’s world reserve status, and the end of sovereign economic governance.
For those who doubt this scenario, read Paul Volcker’s latest statement, as reported by Zero Hedge.
Volcker, the same man who was directly involved in the destruction of the first Bretton Woods agreement and the final death rattle of the gold standard, is now promoting a NEW Bretton Woods-style agreement in which currencies are pegged to a controlled market system — in essence, a centralized international monetary system. Volcker also suggests that a single nation-based reserve currency like the dollar may be a danger to overall fiscal health.
Volcker is right. The dollar-dominated forex casino and fiat fraud is a danger to the world. Volcker helped make it that way! And what a surprise, the former Federal Reserve chairman has a solution on a silver platter for the American people — all we need is GLOBAL centralization and bureaucratic oversight.
The propaganda is being carefully planted within the mainstream. Christine Lagarde of the IMF now spends the whole of her media interviews inserting the phrase “global economic reset” without explaining exactly what that would entail, while central banking elites like Volcker suggest a Bretton Woods II conference leading to a global monetary authority. In the meantime, Russian government-funded media outlets like RT produce pieces accusing the U.S. of being a nuclear menace while we Americans get to watch manipulative Hollywood films like “Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit,” which depicts a Russian plot to collapse the U.S. economy. China and U.S. representatives squabble with each other at geopolitical meetings fueling fears of diplomatic breakdown, while the Pentagon “suggests” they may have to revamp their military strategies in consideration of yet another World War. Just as in Orwell’s book, 1984, old enemies become allies and then enemies once again, and at the top of the pyramid, it’s all a farce.
The best lies contain elements of truth. The truth here is that the East is forming alliances in opposition to the West, the West is involved in underhanded covert operations all over the planet, and both “sides” are in fact on the verge of a catastrophic battle for supremacy. The great lie is that important details have been left out of our little story. Both sides are merely puppet pieces in a grand game of global chess, and any conflict will ultimately benefit the small group of men standing over the board. They include the international financiers who have influenced the very policy fabric of each government toward a climactic crisis which they hope will finally give them the “New World Order” they have always dreamed of.
The Rutherford Institute
By John W. Whitehead
“Fear isn’t so difficult to understand. After all, weren’t we all frightened as children? Nothing has changed since Little Red Riding Hood faced the big bad wolf. What frightens us today is exactly the same sort of thing that frightened us yesterday. It’s just a different wolf.” ― Alfred Hitchcock
In an age dominated with news of school shootings, school lockdowns, police shootings of unarmed citizens (including children), SWAT team raids gone awry (leaving children devastated and damaged), reports of school resource officers tasering and shackling unruly students, and public schools undergoing lockdowns and active drills, I find myself wrestling with the question: how do you prepare a child for life in the American police state?
Every parent lives with a fear of the dangers that prey on young children: the predators who lurk at bus stops and playgrounds, the traffickers who make a living by selling young bodies, the peddlers who push drugs that ensnare and addict, the gangs that deal in violence and bullets, the drunk drivers, the school bullies, the madmen with guns, the diseases that can end a life before it’s truly begun, the cynicism of a modern age that can tarnish innocence, and the greed of a corporate age that makes its living by trading on young consumers.
It’s difficult enough raising a child in a world ravaged by war, disease, poverty and hate, but when you add the police state into the mix—with its battlefield mindset, weaponry, rigidity, surveillance, fascism, indoctrination, violence, etc.—it becomes near impossible to guard against the toxic stress of police shootings, SWAT team raids, students being tasered and shackled, lockdown drills, and a growing unease that some of the monsters of our age come dressed in government uniforms.
Children are taught from an early age that there are consequences for their actions. Hurt somebody, lie, steal, cheat, etc., and you will get punished. But how do you explain to a child that a police officer can shoot someone who was doing nothing wrong and get away with it? That a cop can lie, steal, cheat, or kill and still not be punished?
Kids understand accidents: sometimes drinks get spilled, dishes get broken, people slip and fall and hurt themselves, or you bump into someone without meaning to, and they get hurt. As long as it wasn’t intentional and done with malice, you forgive them and you move on. Police shootings of unarmed people—of children and old people and disabled people—can’t just be shrugged off as accidents, however.
Tamir Rice was no accident. Cleveland police shot and killed the 12-year-old, who was seen playing on a playground with a pellet gun. Surveillance footage shows police shooting the boy two seconds after getting out of a moving patrol car. Incredibly, the shooting was deemed “reasonable” and “justified” by two law enforcement experts who concluded that the police use of force “did not violate Tamir’s constitutional rights.”
Aiyana Jones was also no accident. The 7-year-old was killed after a Detroit SWAT team launched a flash-bang grenade into her family’s apartment, broke through the door and opened fire, hitting the little girl who was asleep on the living room couch. The cops weren’t even in the right apartment. Ironically, on the same day that President Obama refused to stop equipping police with the very same kinds of military weapons and gear used to raid Aiyana’s home, it was reported that the police officer who shot and killed the little girl would not face involuntary manslaughter charges.
Obama insists that $263 million to purchase body cameras for police will prevent any further erosions of trust, but a body camera would not have prevented Aiyana from being shot in the head. Indeed, the entire sorry affair was captured on camera: a TV crew was filming the raid for an episode of The First 48, a true-crime reality show in which homicide detectives have 48 hours to crack a case.
While that $263 million will make Taser International, the manufacturer of the body cameras, a whole lot richer, it’s doubtful it would have prevented a SWAT team from shooting 14-month-old Sincere in the shoulder and hand and killing his mother.
No body camera could have stopped a Georgia SWAT team from launching a flash-bang grenade into the house in which Baby Bou Bou, his three sisters and his parents were staying. The grenade landed in the 2-year-old’s crib, burning a hole in his chest and leaving him with scarring that a lifetime of surgeries will not be able to easily undo.
No body camera could have prevented 10-year-old Dakota Corbitt from being shot by a Georgia police officer who tried to shoot an inquisitive dog, missed, and hit the young boy, instead.
When police shot 4-year-old Ava Ellis in the leg, shattering the bone, it actually was an accident, but it was an accident that could have been prevented. Police reported to Ava’s house after being told that Ava’s mother, who had cut her arm, was in need of a paramedic. Cops claimed that the family pet charged the officer who was approaching the house, causing him to fire his gun and hit the little girl.
Alberto Sepulveda, 11, died from one “accidental” shotgun round to the back, after a SWAT team raided his parents’ home. Thirteen-year-old Andy Lopez Cruz was shot 7 times in 10 seconds by a California police officer who mistook the boy’s toy gun for an assault rifle. Christopher Roupe, 17, was shot and killed after opening the door to a police officer. The officer, mistaking the Wii remote control in Roupe’s hand for a gun, shot him in the chest.
These children are more than grim statistics on a police blotter. They are the heartbreaking casualties of the government’s endless, deadly wars on terror, on drugs, and on the American people themselves.
Not even the children who survive their encounters with police escape unscathed. Increasingly, their lives are daily lessons in compliance and terror, meted out with every SWAT team raid, roadside strip search, and school drill.
Who is calculating the damage being done to the young people forced to watch as their homes are trashed and their dogs are shot during SWAT team raids? A Minnesota SWAT team actually burst into one family’s house, shot the family’s dog, handcuffed the children and forced them to “sit next to the carcass of their dead and bloody pet for more than an hour.” They later claimed it was the wrong house.
More than 80% of American communities have their own SWAT teams, with more than 80,000 of these paramilitary raids are carried out every year. That translates to more than 200 SWAT team raids every day in which police crash through doors, damage private property, terrorize adults and children alike, kill family pets, assault or shoot anyone that is perceived as threatening—and all in the pursuit of someone merely suspected of a crime, usually some small amount of drugs.
What are we to tell our nation’s children about the role of police in their lives? Do you parrot the government line that police officers are community helpers who are to be trusted and obeyed at all times? Do you caution them to steer clear of a police officer, warning them that any interactions could have disastrous consequences? Or is there some happy medium between the two that, while being neither fairy tale nor horror story, can serve as a cautionary tale for young people who will encounter police at virtually every turn?
No matter what you say, there can be no avoiding the hands-on lessons being taught in the schools about the role of police in our lives, ranging from active shooter drills and school-wide lockdowns to incidents in which children engaging in typically childlike behavior are suspended (for shooting an imaginary “arrow” at a fellow classmate), handcuffed (for being disruptive at school), arrested (for throwing water balloons as part of a school prank), and even tasered (for not obeying instructions).
For example, a middle school in Washington State went on lockdown after a student brought a toy gun to class. A Boston high school went into lockdown for four hours after a bullet was discovered in a classroom. A North Carolina elementary school locked down and called in police after a fifth grader reported seeing an unfamiliar man in the school (it turned out to be a parent).
Better safe than sorry is the rationale offered to those who worry that these drills are terrorizing and traumatizing young children. As journalist Dahlia Lithwick points out: “I don’t recall any serious national public dialogue about lockdown protocols or how they became the norm. It seems simply to have begun, modeling itself on the lockdowns that occur during prison riots, and then spread until school lockdowns and lockdown drills are as common for our children as fire drills, and as routine as duck-and-cover drills were in the 1950s.”
These drills have, indeed, become routine.
As the New York Times reports: “Most states have passed laws requiring schools to devise safety plans, and several states, including Michigan, Kentucky and North Dakota, specifically require lockdown drills. Some drills are as simple as a principal making an announcement and students sitting quietly in a darkened classroom. At other schools, police officers and school officials playact a shooting, stalking through the halls like gunmen and testing whether doors have been locked.”
Police officers at a Florida middle school carried out an active shooter drill in an effort to educate students about how to respond in the event of an actual shooting crisis. Two armed officers, guns loaded and drawn, burst into classrooms, terrorizing the students and placing the school into lockdown mode.
What is particularly chilling is how effective these lessons in compliance are in indoctrinating young people to accept their role in the police state, either as criminals or prison guards. If these exercises are intended to instill fear and compliance into young people, they’re working.
Sociologist Alice Goffman understands how far-reaching the impact of such “exercises” can be on young people. For six years, Goffman lived in a low-income urban neighborhood, documenting the impact such an environment—a microcosm of the police state—on its residents. Her account of neighborhood children playing cops and robbers speaks volumes about how constant exposure to pat downs, strip searches, surveillance and arrests can result in a populace that meekly allows itself to be prodded, poked and stripped.
As journalist Malcolm Gladwell writing for the New Yorker reports:
Goffman sometimes saw young children playing the age-old game of cops and robbers in the street, only the child acting the part of the robber wouldn’t even bother to run away: I saw children give up running and simply stick their hands behind their back, as if in handcuffs; push their body up against a car without being asked; or lie flat on the ground and put their hands over their head. The children yelled, “I’m going to lock you up! I’m going to lock you up, and you ain’t never coming home!” I once saw a six-year-old pull another child’s pants down to do a “cavity search.”
Clearly, our children are getting the message, but it’s not the message that was intended by those who fomented a revolution and wrote our founding documents. Their philosophy was that the police work for us, and “we the people” are the masters, and they are to be our servants. Now that has been turned on its head, fueled by our fears (some legitimate, some hyped along by the government and its media mouthpieces) about the terrors and terrorists that lurk among us.
It’s getting harder by the day to tell young people that we live in a nation that values freedom and which is governed by the rule of law without feeling like a teller of tall tales. Yet as I point out in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, unless something changes and soon for the young people growing up, there will be nothing left of freedom as we have known it but a fairy tale without a happy ending.